High Court Kerala High Court

Udayan vs State Of Kerala on 10 February, 2010

Kerala High Court
Udayan vs State Of Kerala on 10 February, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 448 of 2010()


1. UDAYAN, AGED 44 YEARS,S/O.BHASKARAN
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.NIREESH MATHEW

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN

 Dated :10/02/2010

 O R D E R
                       P. BHAVADASAN, J.
              =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
                      B.A. No. 448 of 2010
              =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
          Dated this the 10th day of February, 2010

                            O R D E R

This is an application filed under section 439 of the Code

of Criminal Procedure seeking bail in relation to Crime No. 1 of

2010 of Adoor Police Station.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that on 1-1-2010

at 00.30 hours the 1st accused was found in possession of 1610

litres of spirit and 220 litres of toddy mixed with spirit in a

Wagon-R car and also in a pick-up van. The contraband articles

were seized and Crime No.1 of 2010 of Adoor Police Station was

registered for offences punishable under sections 55(a)(i), 57A,

58A and 65 of the Abkar Act. The petitioner was implicated on

the basis of the confession statement said to have been given by

the 1st accused. The petitioner is in judicial custody from 1-1-

2010 onwards.

3. According to the petitioner, the only material available

against him is the confession statement of the co-accused and

nothing else would connect him with the seizure.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

BA 448/10 2

The learned Public Prosecutor submits that there are statement

of nearby toddy shop employees, which would indicate that the

petitioner is actively involved in the sale of spirit. It is stated he

is not an innocent as to appear.

5. The case diary was made available for perusal. I find

that the main material as of now against the petitioner is the

confession statement stated to have been given by the 1st

accused. Of course, there are other statements of toddy shop

employees to show his involvement. There is nothing to indicate

that the continued detention of the petitioner is necessary for the

investigation.

6. In the result, this petition is allowed as follows:-

a) The petitioner shall be released on bail on his

executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent

sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction

of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class

concerned.

b) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating

Officer between 9 A.M. and 11 A.M. on all

Fridays, till the final report is laid.

BA 448/10 3

c) The petitioner shall not try to influence the

prosecution witnesses or tamper with the

evidence.

P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE.

mn.