Gujarat High Court High Court

Umang vs Upon on 30 July, 2008

Gujarat High Court
Umang vs Upon on 30 July, 2008
Bench: Jayant Patel
  
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 

MCA/1938/2008	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

MISC.CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR MODIFICATION OF ORDER No. 1938 of 2008
 

In


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 7639 of 2008
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

UMANG
JASHVANTLAL THAKKAR - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

UNION
BANK OF INDIA & 1 - Opponent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
PREMAL R JOSHI for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for Opponent(s) : 1, 
MR
VIRENDRA M GOHIL for Opponent(s) : 1, 
MR BJ TRIVEDI for
Opponent(s) : 2, 
MR JT TRIVEDI for Opponent(s) : 2, 
MS JIGNASA
B TRIVEDI for Opponent(s) :
2, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 30/07/2008 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

It
appears that the present application is for implementation of the
order dated 16.5.2008, and/or clarification thereof on the ground
that the belonging of the petitioner are not permitted to be taken
over by the bank.

Upon
hearing learned Counsel for both the sides, it appears that it is
the case of the respondent that prior to the receipt of the order,
as the other bank namely Bank of India had intimated that the
property is hypothecated, the possession of the same is handed over.

Under
these circumstances, whether the action of the Union Bank of India
of handing over of the possession or that of Bank of India of taking
over of the possession was in accordance with law or not, cannot be
decided in the proceedings of present Misc. Civil Application. If
the petitioner is aggrieved by such action, the petitioner may
resort to independent proceedings as permissible in law.

Hence
in view of the aforesaid observations the present application is
further not entertained and disposed of accordingly. It is clarified
that if the independent proceedings are resorted, the rights and
contentions of both the sides shall remain open.

(JAYANT PATEL, J.)

Suresh*