High Court Karnataka High Court

Umesha S/O Shivalingaiah vs State By Mandya Rural Police … on 13 August, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Umesha S/O Shivalingaiah vs State By Mandya Rural Police … on 13 August, 2010
Author: N.Ananda
IN THE HIGH COURT 012' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 13'%'H DAY 01:' AUGUST 2010 
BEFORE V it
THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE N.  '%;-5:  r.- l 
CRIMINAL PE'"i'I'I'ION Ngisgsso/2*o*1Auo'Zi'  
BETWEEN: ' l A it 

Umesha,

S/o.Shivalingaiah,

Aged 23 Years,

R/a Holalu Village, J g  _ 
Dudda Hobli, Mandya'.t_ai111(, 5 _ .  ~   _
Mandya. " '  V_    .'..Petitioner
{By Sri.C.N.RajL:;'A;:1vocate) ' - 

AND:

State 'Dy Mandye'  l"ol_iE:e Station,
Represented    
High Couri».Comp1ex,'A._ " A 

Bangalore. ... Respondent

 V.  ., {gyfiéri .fx;'i;ay1.;umai~' Majvage, HCGP)

 V' V    f5etiti_on- is filed under section 439 Cr.P.C praying
to " en1ar~gevv.__ti'1e" petitioner on bail in Cr.No.172/ 2010 of

Mandya Rur-;dPolice Station, Mandya, registered for offences
puniishablevunder sections.143, 147, 148, 324, 307, 504 and

7.__506 r/"W149 of IPC.

"~.This petition coming on for orders this day. the Court

  rflladethe following:



{Q

ORDER

The petitioner is arrayed as accused N0.1–<ji1i._.f(',ri:ne

No.172/2010, registered for offences punis1;i«ab'1e'.Qhittindcr

sections 14:3, 147. 148. 324, 307, so4,"5oe_1£/firié;9V'IP¢;.f1*h¢""

other accused have been granted {bail 'by V'

Sessions Judge. The petitioner 'is__in judicial

2. I have heard learned c0uns’cV.!dffor” petitioner and learned
HCGP for State.

3. The learnedv_.cou:§ise1 riefiiprierezfias made availabie

a copy of first» r.egi~stered_ in Crime N 0. 1 7 1 / 20 10

and vfloundxt:e;;tifieaie-ef~i_’;)etitioner/accused No.1. Accused
No.1 had uaiso s’uf.feredb ‘injuries. Thus. there is a case and

counter.

.’ , of wound certificate of injured namely

instant case. I find that he had suffered

folibwing injuries: –

I. Abrasion over vertex measuring 1/2″ x 1/4″. No

‘ haematoma. ‘Vt .

Ii. E-Iaematoma measuring 3″ x 2″ with tenderness of right

upper arm.

Iii. Contusion injury measuring 3*’ x 1/:;_’–‘* A ~

shoulder.

IV. Small inciurate area measuring 1;_§”‘ .2: 1″».over’Iow:er.«e1″;-.Li

of right thigh with tenderness on~.;)’ostero’r:iie.givia1V aspeet. *

The above said injuries natureéand they
were not inflicted on of’the”hodj2.–_’i’herefore, at this
stage, it is not possible” :i<iold_ithat,"~_ti$»'.g,fi1egations made
against thg llarilllloifenee punishable

under section

5. is accepted. The petitioner is

released subjleetltbifollowing conditions-
f.1&’heAAllneti”‘UZoi1er shall execute a bond for a sum of

– {Rupees Twenty Five Thousand
and shall offer two sureties for the iike sum

to the satisfaction of jurisdictional Court.

“N R cg/–(S’»”~*J**’

II. The petitioner shall not intimidate or tamper

with prosecution witnesses.

III. The petitioner shall regularly attend gthetu

SNN