Gujarat High Court High Court

Union vs H on 20 August, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Union vs H on 20 August, 2010
Author: Ravi R.Tripathi,&Nbsp;Honourable S.R.Brahmbhatt,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/20556/2006	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 20556 of 2006
 

With


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 20745 of 2006
 

With


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 20748 of 2006
 

With


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 2615 of 2008
 

With


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 26418 of 2006
 

With


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 26419 of 2006
 

 
 
=========================================================


 

UNION
OF INDIA & 2 - Petitioners
 

Versus
 

H
C PANCHAL & 35 - Respondents
 

=========================================================
Appearance : 
MR
NS SHEVADE for
Petitioners : 1 - 3. 
SUNITA S CHATURVEDI for Respondents : 1 -
6. 
RULE SERVED for Respondents : 7 - 9,11 - 12,14 - 15,18 - 19,22
- 24, 26,29 - 32,35 - 36. 
RULE SERVED BY DS for Respondents : 10,
13,16 - 17,20 - 21, 25, 27,33 - 34. 
- for Respondent: 0.0.0
 
=========================================================


 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 20/08/2010 

 

 
 
COMON
ORAL ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)

Let
these matters be listed on 06.09.2010.

Order
in Special Civil Application No. 20556 of 2006:

There
is a remarks in the board ‘unserved- expired (respondent no.

28)’. Learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to delete
respondent No. 28. Permission is granted.

ORDER
IN SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 26419 OF 2006 :

There
is remarks in the board ‘Rule is unserved to respondent No. 7 as he
has retired from service’. He seeks permission to delete him.
Permission is granted.

Registry
is directed to keep the copy of this order in each matter.

(RAVI
R. TRIPATHI, J.)

(S.R.BRAHMBHATT,
J.)

pallav

   

Top