High Court Kerala High Court

United India Insurance Company … vs Anto on 4 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
United India Insurance Company … vs Anto on 4 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 1300 of 2008()


1. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. ANTO, S/O.VARGHESE, PALLISSERY HOUSE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. JOSE P.V, PALLISSERY HOUSE,

3. P.J.PAUL, S/O.P.V.JOSEPH, PYNADATH HOUSE

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

                For Respondent  :SRI.SHEJI P.ABRAHAM

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :04/11/2008

 O R D E R
                              M.N.KRISHNAN, J.
                              --------------------------
                         M.A.C.A No. 1300 OF 2008
                                ---------------------
                 Dated this the 4thday of November, 2008

                                  JUDGMENT

This appeal is preferred against the award passed by the Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal, Thrissur, in OP(MV) 1177/02. The claimant, a

pillion rider, sustained injuries in a road accident and the Tribunal awarded

him a total compensation of Rs.65,328/- and directed the Insurance

Company to pay the amount.

2. Learned counsel for the Insurance Company would contend

before me that the Company has filed an additional written statement which

was received on 13.6.06 wherein there is a specific contention that the

policy is an Act only policy and no additional premium is received to cover

the risk of a pillion rider and therefore the company is not liable to

indemnify the owner. Unfortunately, the said contention has not been

noticed at all by the Tribunal. Therefore the matter requires interference.

The award under challenge is set aside so far as it relates to the

question of liability of the Insurance Company is concerned. Parties are

permitted to produce documentary as well as oral evidence in support of

their respective contentions. In any event, if no such additional written

statement is filed, then the Tribunal is at liberty to confirm the earlier order.

Parties are directed to appear before the Tribunal on 18.12.08.

M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE
vps

2