High Court Kerala High Court

United India Insurance Company … vs Narayanan Nair on 31 October, 2008

Kerala High Court
United India Insurance Company … vs Narayanan Nair on 31 October, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 578 of 2008()


1. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. NARAYANAN NAIR, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
                       ...       Respondent

2. PRAKASAN P., S/O. KORAN, POTTAMMAL HOUSE

3. DILEEP NARAYANAN, PROPRIETOR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

                For Respondent  :SRI.N.RAGHURAJ

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :31/10/2008

 O R D E R
                          M.N. KRISHNAN, J
                          -----------------------
                       M.A.C.A.No. 578 OF 2008
                    ---------------------------------
                Dated this the 31st day of October, 2008


                               JUDGMENT

This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor Accident

Claims Tribunal, Tirur in O.P.(MV) 613/2004. When the appeal came

up for consideration before me, I entertained a doubt regarding the

maintainability of the appeal and therefore heard the learned counsel

appearing for the appellant as well as the respondent. The claim

petition is filed in October 2004 and the appeal is preferred on

23.5.2007. The time till filing of the appeal is about 32 months. The

Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 7,000/- with 9% interest and a cost

of Rs. 500/-. If the consolidated amount is calculated the amount of

interest plus cost will come to Rs. 2,184/- which when added with the

principal amount of Rs. 7,000/- would come to Rs. 9,184/-. Section

173(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act reads as “no appeal shall lie against

any award of a claims Tribunal if the amount disputed in the appeal is

less than Rs. 10,000/-“. Here the amount is only Rs. 9,184/- and

therefore there is a clear statutory bar to file an appeal under the

provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act. With liberty to the appellant

herein to approach appropriate forum if the law permits the appeal is

rejected.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE
vkm