High Court Kerala High Court

Unnikrishnan.S vs State Bank Of India on 9 September, 2009

Kerala High Court
Unnikrishnan.S vs State Bank Of India on 9 September, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 24843 of 2009(A)


1. UNNIKRISHNAN.S.,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE BANK OF INDIA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. AUTHORISED OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM

 Dated :09/09/2009

 O R D E R
                      C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J.
                      ------------------------------
                    W.P.(C).No.24843 OF 2009
                      ------------------------------
          Dated this the 9th day of September, 2009

                          J U D G M E N T

———————-

1. The petitioner had availed a loan from the 1st

respondent Bank to the tune of Rs.7 lakhs, repayment of which

was defaulted and consequently the Bank had initiated

proceedings for recovery of the amount by taking over

possession of the secured assets under the provisions of the

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and

Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002 (SARFAESI Act).

Ext.P2 is the notice issued under Section 13(4) of the said At.

Contention of the petitioner is that he is ready and willing to

discharge entire debts due to the Bank in installments, provided

sufficient time is granted.

2. Heard Standing Counsel for the respondents. It is

submitted that the petitioner is a gross defaulter and the arrears

accrued in the loan account as on 1.3.2009 is Rs.9,70,784/-. It is

further submitted that the petitioner had unauthorisedly put the

secured assets in possession of third parties and the Bank is now

finding it difficult to take over possession, because of the illegal

and malafide acts on the part of the petitioner. The standing

counsel vehemently opposed granting any installment facility.

3. Having considered the rival contentions I am of the

W.P.(C).24843/09 2

opinion that some indulgence can be shown in the matter to

allow the petitioner to settle the liability before permitting the

Bank to take over physical possession and conducting sale of the

properties. Therefore the respondent Bank is directed to keep

in abeyance all proceedings pursuant to Ext.P2 notice, if the

petitioner makes payment of an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- on or

before 15.10.2009. On payment of the said amount the 1st

respondent Bank shall furnish a statement of account to the

petitioner showing the entire balance as on that date after

crediting all payments, and the petitioner shall pay the entire

balance so intimated in 5 equal monthly installments starting

from 15.11.2009 onwards and on the 15th day of every

succeeding month.

4. It is made clear that on the event of default in

payment of the initial amount or any subsequent installments the

benefit granted under this Judgment will stand automatically

recalled and the petitioner will be precluded from raising any

further challenge against the proceedings under the SARFAESI

Act. It is further made clear that the benefit granted as above is

subject to the condition that the petitioner is precluded from

raising any subsequent challenge against the proceedings under

the SARFAESI Act, before this Court or before any other Forum.

C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.

okb