High Court Kerala High Court

Unnikrishnan vs Haridas on 9 December, 2009

Kerala High Court
Unnikrishnan vs Haridas on 9 December, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 34959 of 2009(L)


1. UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O. GOVINDA PILLAI,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. HARIDAS,
                       ...       Respondent

2. RAJENDRAN,

3. RURAL S.P.,

4. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,

5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE

                For Petitioner  :SRI.J.S.AJITHKUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR

 Dated :09/12/2009

 O R D E R
      KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ.
        ------------------------------------------------
               W.P(C) No.34959 of 2009
         -----------------------------------------------
     Dated this the 9th day of December, 2009

                        JUDGMENT

Kurian Joseph, J.

The petitioner approached this court

complaining of police harassment.

2. Learned Government Pleader, on

instruction, submits that the police is only

conducting an enquiry on a complaint that there

was a change of driver of Vehicle a BMW Car

bearing temporary registration No.KL-39/B-3043,

9subsequently registered as KL-16.F5) on the

date of the accident.

3. According to the petitioner,he has been

unnecessarily harassed by the police, though the

vehicle is duly registered and though the driver

of the vehicle has been enlarged on bail. It is

also submitted that he had taken the victims to

the hospital and he had also attended to their

medical care.

4. There are disputes on these aspects.

Be that as it may, in case the presence of the

W.P(C)No.34959 of 2009

:: 2 ::

petitioner is required for the purpose of any

enquiry/investigation, he shall be issued a

notice in writing. In case the petitioner has

any grievance with regard to the discharge of

official duties by the police, it is for him to

approach the ‘Police Complaint Authority’. In

case the petitioner has any grievance with

regard to the procedure adopted in the

investigation, it is for the petitioner to

approach the magistrate having jurisdiction.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

(KURIAN JOSEPH)
JUDGE

Sd/-

(C.T.RAVIKUMAR)
JUDGE

SK/-

//true copy//

P.S. to Judge.