High Court Kerala High Court

Unnimaya.T.U vs State Of Kerala on 30 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
Unnimaya.T.U vs State Of Kerala on 30 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 33479 of 2009(D)


1. UNNIMAYA.T.U,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SAUMYA.S, LPSA,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,

4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

5. THE MANAGER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.AUGUSTINE JOSEPH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :30/11/2009

 O R D E R
                T.R RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J.
                      -------------------------
                  W.P ( C) No.33479 of 2009
                      --------------------------
            Dated this the 30th November,2009

                        J U D G M E N T

Petitioners herein are working as Lower Primary

School Assistants under the 5th respondent Manager. They

were appointed as per Exts.P1 and P2 orders in permanent

vacancies.

2. By Exts.P3 and P4, their appointments have

been approved only on daily wage basis for the periods

shown in the said orders.

3. This is challenged by the petitioners in this writ

petition. It is pointed out that the approvals have been

restricted by relying on Ext.P5 order. Ext.P5 order is

dated 10.6.2008.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted

that in the light of the decision of the Division Bench of

this Court, produced as Ext.P6, the orders of approval as

passed now cannot be sustained. Therein, this Court has

held that Ext.P5 Government Order cannot be enforced

without amendment of the statutory rules.

W.P ( C) No.33479 of 2009
2

5. It is therefore clear that the orders of approval

granted cannot be justified. The principles laid down in

Ext.P6, applies herein.

6. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions,

submitted that the Manager has already filed separate

appeals before the 3rd respondent in the matter which are

pending. Therefore, the 3rd respondent will take a decision

on the appeals in the light of the direction issued in

Ext.P6 judgment within a period of six weeks from the date

of receipt of a copy of this judgment keeping in mind the

principles stated by the Division Bench in Ext.P6.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

T.R RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
JUDGE

ma

W.P ( C) No.33479 of 2009
3

W.P ( C) No.33479 of 2009
4