Gujarat High Court High Court

Unserved-Expired (N) For … vs 6 on 9 March, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Unserved-Expired (N) For … vs 6 on 9 March, 2010
Author: Ravi R.Tripathi,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/9952/2009	 1/ 1	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9952 of 2009
 

 
=========================================


 

MAHADEVBHAI
ROOPCHANDBHAI MAHESHWARI
 

Versus
 

KANTILAL
C MEHTA AND OTHERS
 

=========================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
VAIBHAV N SHETH for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
UNSERVED-EXPIRED (N) for Respondent(s) : 1,
6, 
NOTICE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 2 - 5,8 - 15. 
NOTICE
UNSERVED for Respondent(s) :
7, 
=========================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
		
	

 

 


 

Date
: 09/03/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

Mr.Vaibhav
N.Sheth, learned advocate for the petitioner, requests that he be
granted leave to amend to delete respondent Nos.1 and 6 as they have
expired and he be permitted to add the persons appointed as trustees
in place of respondent Nos.1 and 6. Permission is granted.
Amendment shall be carried out during the course of the day.

So far as
respondent No.7 is concerned, who has remained unserved with an
endorsement that, ‘not residing at the given address’, learned
advocate for the petitioner requests that fresh notice be issued qua
respondent No.7 and direct service be permitted. Request is granted.

Registry is
directed to issue fresh NOTICE qua respondent
No.7 returnable on 22.03.2010.

Direct
service is permitted.

(Ravi
R.Tripathi, J.)

*Shitole

   

Top