* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) No.8235/2010 & CM No. 21205/2010
% Date of Decision: 09.03.2011
UOI & Ors. ...... Petitioners
Through Mr. Amit Dubey, Advocate
Versus
Shri Virender Kumar Yadav & Anr. ...... Respondents
Through Mr. A.K. Bhakta, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be NO
allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in NO
the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
The petitioners have challenged the order dated 10th February,
2009, whereby the OA No. 1642/2008, titled as Virender Kumar Yadav
& Anr. Vs. UOI & Ors., was allowed on the basis of order dated 11th
March, 2008 passed in OA No.1725/2007 and OA No.2083/2007.
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, states that
the writ petitions filed against the order dated 11th March, 2008 passed
CWP 8235/2010 Page 1 of 2
in OA Nos. 1725/2007 and 2083/2007 were withdrawn with liberty to
the petitioners in those matters to file the appropriate review
applications in accordance with law.
Consequently, learned counsel for the petitioners, on
instructions, seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to
file an appropriate review application in accordance with law.
The petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as
prayed for.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
March 09, 2011 VEENA BIRBAL, J.
'rs'
CWP 8235/2010 Page 2 of 2