Upendra Das & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 6 November, 2009

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
                                   C.M.P No. 210     OF 2009

      1.Upendra Das
      2.Kamdeo Das
      3.Muni Das
      4.Naresh Das
      5.Jagdish Das
      6.Sikandar Das
      7.Ram Prasad Das
      8.Shambhu Ravidas
      9.Ghostan Das
      10.Fucho Das
      11.Bodan Das
      12.Shiro Das
      13.Deonarayan Das
      14.Shukar Das
      15.Gopal Das
      16.Jaykant Das
      17.Katki Das
      18.Basu Das
      19.Mani Harijan
      20.Birendra Harijan
      21.Daso Harijan
                                                    Vs.

      1.TheState of Jharkhand
      2.The Commissioner, Santal Pargana Division, Dumka
      3.The Deputy Commissioner, Godda
      4.The Sub-Divisional Officer, Godda
      5.The Circle Officer, Godda
      6.The 16 Annas Raiyat of Mauza Belari
         through its Pradhan Shrimant Mirdha @ Yadav
      7.Gokul Harijan
      8. Naresh Das Harijan
      9.Bhakan Ravidas
      10.Sudan Ravidas
      11.Lochan Harijan
      12.Narayan Harijan
      13.Satish Harijan @ Chhatish Harijan
      14.Sita Ram Das
      15.Lewari Das
      16.Devani Das
      17.Khublab Das
                                                  -------

      CORAM                             HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                                       HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.K.SINHA


      For the Petitioners                           Ms.Ritu Kumar

      For the Respondents                           JC to GP III
                                                    ---------

2/6.11.2009

This is an application for restoration of L.P.A No.196/2004, which

was dismissed on account of non-appearance of the counsel for the appellants.
2

It has been stated that the appellants’ counsel had to suddenly go to

Vellore in connection with the treatment of his 13 year old son and in the state of

mental agony, he could not make an alternative arrangement in his place and

instruct any one to take care of the matter, which was running on the Board.

Taking into consideration the hardship of the counsel for the

appellants, we take a lenient view of the matter and restore the aforesaid appeal to

its original number, to be heard on merit. This application for restoration is allowed

and disposed of.

(Gyan Sudha Misra, C.J)

(D.K.Sinha,J)
dey