High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Upendra Singh @ Bhim Singh vs State Of Bihar on 2 July, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Upendra Singh @ Bhim Singh vs State Of Bihar on 2 July, 2010
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Cr.Misc. No.16094 of 2010
       UPENDRA SINGH @ BHIM SINGH, S/o Bir Bahadur Singh.
                             Versus
                      THE STATE OF BIHAR
                            -----------

03. 02.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted

for the offences under Sections 326, 307 and 109/34

of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arm

Act.

It has been submitted that even though in

the First Information Report the informant alleged

that the petitioner had fired at him but when he was

examined during trial he refused to identify the

petitioner.

In view of such, let the petitioner, above

named who is in custody since 15.03.2010 be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with

Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 13 of 2010 subject to the

following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be

a close relative of the petitioner who will give an
2

affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with

the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to

inform the Court if there is any change in the address

of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on

affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar

nature after his release in the present case and

thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate

the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground

of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on

the given date and be present on date fixed for charge

and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays

the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the

petitioner will be well represented on each date and if

he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will

be liable to be cancelled.

In view of the antecedents of the petitioner,

the petitioner is directed to appear before the Supdt.

of Police, Saran within fifteen days of his release with

a copy of this order and thereafter every two weeks for

the next nine months. The conduct of the petitioner
3

will be kept under watch in this period by the S.P.

concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a

report shall be made to the court concerned by him to

initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for

reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the

Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by

the petitioner before the court concerned.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-