Urmila Devi & Anr vs The State Of Bihar on 22 November, 2011

0
71
Patna High Court – Orders
Urmila Devi & Anr vs The State Of Bihar on 22 November, 2011
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   Criminal Miscellaneous No.35109 of 2011
                   1.      Urmila Devi, W/o Late Kamleshwari Malakar
                   2.      Sanjay Malakar, S/o - Late Kamleshwari Malakar
                   All resident of village -Mirchai Gaili in front of Nil Kamal Jewelery near
                   Manihari More, P.S. - Sahayak Katihar, District. - Katihar.
                                                                             --------- Petitioners.
                                                     Versus
                   The State of Bihar                                   -------Opposite Party
                                                    *******

03. 22.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in

connection with Compliant Case No. 3286/2010 for

offences under Sections 420/465/467/468/323/504/349

of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 138 N.I.

Act, are named accused in this case complaint case

relating to some transaction and payment of

consideration amount etc.

Submission is that parties have already

settled their dispute and filed petition of compromise

which is pending disposal.

In view of the above, in the event of

complainant appearing before the court below

supporting factum of compromise with his free-will

and consent without and coercion and stood as one of

the bailors, and in the event of their arrest or surrender
within a period of four weeks, let the above-named

petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond

of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with

two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Katihar, in connection

with Compliant Case No. 3286/2010, subject to

condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court

regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure

on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable

explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to

be cancelled.

Rajeev/-                                         ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)
 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *