Gujarat High Court High Court

Uttar vs Rule on 30 November, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Uttar vs Rule on 30 November, 2010
Author: M.R. Shah,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

MCA/840/2010	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

MISC.CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR RESTORATION No. 840 of 2010
 

In


 

SECOND
APPEAL No. 30 of 2010
 

 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To be
			referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

=========================================================


 

UTTAR
GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

SHANKARBHAI
PRABHUBHAI BRAMHAN - Opponent(s)
 

=========================================================
Appearance : 
MR
DIPAK R DAVE for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR ANKIT Y BACHANI for Opponent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 05/05/2010 

 

 
ORAL
JUDGMENT

1. Rule.

Shri Ankit Bachani, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule
on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of the learned
advocates for the respective parties, the application is taken up for
final hearing today.

2. Present
application has been preferred by the applicant herein -original
appellant to restore the main Second Appeal No. 30 of 2010 which came
to be dismissed for non prosecution by order dated 09.03.2010 as on
that day though the matter was called out twice, learned advocate for
the applicant remain absent.

3. Having
heard the learned advocates for the respective parties and subject to
payment of cost which is quantified at Rs. 1500/-, to be deposited by
the applicant with the Registry on or before 12.5.2010, present
application is allowed and Second Appeal No. 30 of 2010 is restored
to file. On such deposit, Registry is directed to transmit the same
to the Gujarat High Court Legal Service Committee. Rule is made
absolute.

(M.R.SHAH,
J.)

kaushik

   

Top