V.A.Augustine vs The District Executive Officer on 7 January, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 661 of 2008(D)


1. V.A.AUGUSTINE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DISTRICT EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT

3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

4. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R.),

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JOSE ABRAHAM

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :07/01/2008

 O R D E R
                        ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
             ------------------------------------
                        W.P.(C) 661 of 2008
            -------------------------------------
                       Dated: January 7, 2008

                             JUDGMENT

What is now under challenge is Ext.P3 appellate order issued

by the 2nd respondent. Ext.P3 order is dated 25.1.2005. Now that

revenue recovery proceedings have been initiated in December

2007, this writ petition has been filed on 4.1.2008 challenging

Ext.P3.

2. There is absolutely no explanation for the delay involved in

filing the writ petition. In my view, this writ petition is highly

belated and in the absence of any explanation, this writ petition is

dismissed.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE

mt/-