High Court Kerala High Court

V.A.Jacob vs Jeeboy Thomas on 24 February, 2010

Kerala High Court
V.A.Jacob vs Jeeboy Thomas on 24 February, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RP.No. 1220 of 2009()


1. V.A.JACOB, VAZHIYAMBALATHIL
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. JEEBOY THOMAS, S/O.T.P.THOMAS,
                       ...       Respondent

2. VARGHESE GEORGE @ SAJ

3. THE MANAGER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice MR.P.R.RAMAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

 Dated :24/02/2010

 O R D E R
                      P.R.RAMAN, Ag.C.J. &
                 P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

                    -------------------------------

       R.P.No.1220 of 2009 in M.F.A.No.1266 of 1995
                    -------------------------------

            Dated this the 24th day of February, 2010

                             O R D E R

Raman, Ag.C.J.

The review petition is filed on the sole ground that

interest on the additional compensation which we have awarded

as per our judgment dated 19.10.2009 is only from the date of

the judgment, instead of the date of application. The learned

counsel appearing for the review petitioner placed reliance on the

decision of the Apex Court in Chameli Wati and another v.

Delhi Municipal Corporation (AIR 1986 SC 1191) in this

regard. As a matter of fact, interest was ordered with effect

from the date of the judgment, taking note of fact that the

Tribunal has awarded interest at the rate of 12% per annum

from the date of accident (which is on the higher side) and

further the appeal itself was dismissed for default and it was

restored only much later. The delay is also a factor to be

reckoned for granting interest, as it will prejudicially affect the

right of other side. It was taking note of all the above facts that

R.P.No.1220 of 2009

2

the interest was made effective from the date of judgment.

Hence, we do not find any grounds to review the judgment.

Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed.

P.R.RAMAN,
Ag. CHIEF JUSTICE

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON,
JUDGE

nj.