High Court Kerala High Court

V.Ajaykumar vs Thiruvananthapuram District … on 5 December, 2007

Kerala High Court
V.Ajaykumar vs Thiruvananthapuram District … on 5 December, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 32183 of 2007(F)


1. V.AJAYKUMAR,S/O. VELAYUDHAN NAIR
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE

3. CHIRAYINKEEZHU GOVT. EMPLOYEES

4. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CO-OPERATIVE URBAN

5. CHEMBOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,

6. SUPERINTENDENT, E.S.I HOSPITAL

                For Petitioner  :SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :05/12/2007

 O R D E R
           THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
                    ---------------------------------------------
                      W.P.(C).No.32183 of 2007
                    ---------------------------------------------
              Dated this the 5th day of December, 2007




                            JUDGMENT

The petitioner while working as Nursing Assistant in

E.S.I. Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram was benevolent to

stand as a guarantor for loan transactions, which has

resulted in recoveries, invoking Section 37 of the Kerala

Co-operative Societies Act, whereby, a portion of the

petitioners emoluments is intended to be recovered.

According to him, he is now aged 42 years old, is physically

handicapped and has a family to maintain. I find no error of

jurisdiction or legal infirmity in the impugned proceedings.

However, having regard to the different aspects of the

situation, it is directed that the recovery from salary of the

petitioner on account of the debts due as a guarantor would

stand pegged at 60% of the amounts, now being

deducted, per month. The amounts so deducted shall be

WPC32183/2007 2

promptly credited to the accounts of the creditor institution

separately in equal amounts. This shall be without

prejudice to the right of the creditors to move against the

other debtors and also further against the petitioner, if the

debts remained unsatisfied.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,
JUDGE

csl