V.J. Philomina vs Lizzy Jacob on 9 July, 2007

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Con Case(C) No. 937 of 2007(S)


1. V.J. PHILOMINA, AGED 57 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. LIZZY JACOB,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :09/07/2007

 O R D E R
                            H.L.Dattu,C.J. & K.T.Sankaran,J.

                         ---------------------------------------------------

                          Cont.Case (C).No.937 of 2007-S

                         ---------------------------------------------------

                           Dated, this the 9th day of July, 2007


                                          JUDGMENT

H.L.Dattu,C.J.

Alleging that the respondent herein has disobeyed the interim

orders and directions issued by this Court in W.A.No.476 of 2007 dated 23rd

February, 2007, the complainant-petitioner is before us in this contempt

petition.

(2) On instructions, the learned Government Advocate would

state that the complainant is expected to furnish certain details for calculating

the pensionary benefits payable to her.

(3) The learned counsel appearing for the complainant would

submit that the complainant has already furnished the necessary information

to the respondent. He further submits that in case the respondent wants any

further information, the complainant would furnish the same to the respondent.

(4) In view of the above, the following order is passed for the

present:

(i) The complainant-petitioner shall furnish all the details to the

respondent for disbursal of the admissible pensionary benefits in a week’s time

from today.

(ii) After receipt of the information from the complainant, the

respondent is directed to disburse the admissible pensionary benefits to the

complainant, we make it clear, without raising hypotechnical doubts.

(iii) That shall be done by the respondent within four weeks from the

date of submission of the details as directed by the respondent.

Cont.Case (C).No.937 of 2007-S – 2 –

(iv) If for any reason the respondent does not comply with the

orders and directions issued by us today, the complainant is at liberty to

approach this Court once again.

Ordered accordingly.

H.L.Dattu

Chief Justice

K.T.Sankaran

Judge

vku/-