High Court Kerala High Court

V.K.Krishnamurthy vs State Of Kerala Rep. By The … on 17 June, 2009

Kerala High Court
V.K.Krishnamurthy vs State Of Kerala Rep. By The … on 17 June, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 16331 of 2009(J)


1. V.K.KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED 54 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECRETARY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION,

3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY

4. KSHEEROTHPADHAKA SAHAKARANA SANGAM,

5. THE RETURNING OFFICER/DIARY EXTENSION

                For Petitioner  :SRI.RAJIT

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :17/06/2009

 O R D E R
                      ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                     ================
                 W.P.(C) NO. 16331 OF 2009 (J)
                 =====================

              Dated this the 17th day of June, 2009

                          J U D G M E N T

In terms of the provisions of the Kerala Co-operative

Societies Act and Rules, the election to the 4th respondent society

was scheduled on 22/5/2009 and voters list was finalised and all

procedural formalities were complied with. At that stage

consequent on the parliamentary election, by Exts.P2 and P3,

elections were ordered to be postponed. According to the

petitioner, now proceedings are being taken to hold the election

with the same voters list. Thereupon, he filed Ext.P5

representation to the Registrar requesting that fresh voters list be

taken. It is stated that such a voters list is necessary for the

reason that in the interregnum, many of the members of the

society have become ineligible to vote and many of them have

become eligible.

2. In my view, such a repetitive preparation of the voters

list is not contemplated in the rules. If for any reason, an election

process once commenced is postponed, the electoral roll should

remain the same. If that be so, the prayer made by the petitioner

WPC 16331/09
:2 :

cannot be accepted.

3. Although the counsel for the petitioner submitted that

in terms of the bylaws, preparation of a fresh voters list is

necessary, having regard to the statutory provisions, I cannot

accept the contention raised.

Writ petition fails and is dismissed.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp