IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
DATED THIS THE 03"! my OF SEPTE1\éi']3:1:E§"R"t".?f}'--3:(V).
BEFORE
THE HONBLE MR. IUSTICE H .°N__. :1'=IAL(}Ai\ki_{:.)fIAN" R
C.A.743/2010 IN CA.1'8$:2f20G?;. C/W"'A2f5=5/Vi§3§9V
BEI WEEN:
(By '
M/S. N.?'.cONFEcTioN;xRaۤ*VT LTD
REPRESENT«ED'~BY OFFECIJLL LIQUIDATOR
" _ , .RESPONDENT
Vf ~{B3} Sr: & VJAYARAM FOR 01.)
THIS§f;A’RPL:cATI0N FILED UNDER RULES 6 8: 9 OF
THE coM1>ANY(coURT) RULES 1959 PRAYING TO RECALL
AATVIEIE ORDER DT.22.1.2009.
This application coming on for orders this day, the court
. Lnade the following;
aw,
QRDER
This application is filed to recall the order
On 22.1.2009 the matter was set dovfn foirire;co«rdi1:1Ag
on the side of respondent. Since -none appeared on’l’:he4_side:i;of the 0′ ;
applicant, the evidence of vvasas closed.
Therefore, the present .There is inordinate
delay in filing EI.owief.:\plf,i’piffiyjftore opportunity is
to be subject to certain terms.
allowed. The order dated
22.1.200’i_is’ “rnatter before the Civil Iudge Leave
Res=.;3rver..fori recordingii evidence on 27.09.2010 or any other
jconveriienttlate fixed by the Civil Iudge. The applicant to pay
“costs to the account of Estate and Establishment
it Fundniajntained by the Official liquidator.
Sdf-1
qaaqe
{D X23