IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 22851 of 2009(B)
1. V.MOIDEENKUTTY, S/O.MOHAMMED, AGED
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent
2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
4. THE MANAGER,
5. THE HEADMASTER,
For Petitioner :SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED
For Respondent :SRI.T.A.SHAJI
The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
Dated :05/10/2009
O R D E R
T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C) No.22851 of 2009-B
- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 5th day of October, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel
appearing for the 4th respondent Manager. The petitioner has filed this writ
petition aggrieved by Exts.P6 and P7. It is submitted by the learned counsel
appearing for the 4th respondent that the suspension ordered against the
petitioner stands withdrawn and the petitioner has been ordered to be
reinstated in service. In that view of the matter, it is not necessary to
consider the validity of Exts.P6 and P7. In the light of the order reinstating
the petitioner in service, no further orders are required in this writ petition.
If the petitioner has got any other grievance,he can approach the appropriate
authorities in the matter.
The writ petition is closed.
(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)
kav/