High Court Kerala High Court

V.N.Sukumaran vs The Kerala Co-Operative … on 30 July, 2008

Kerala High Court
V.N.Sukumaran vs The Kerala Co-Operative … on 30 July, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 13585 of 2008(P)


1. V.N.SUKUMARAN, MELAMPARAMBIL
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE KERALA CO-OPERATIVE ARBITRATION
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE VARAPPUZHA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE

3. SRI. RETNAKARA PAI, S/O.VENKITESWARA PAI

4. THE KERALA CO-OPERATIVE TRIBUNAL

5. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.JAYASANKAR

                For Respondent  :R2I.P.N.MOHANAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :30/07/2008

 O R D E R
         THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.

  = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

            W.P.(C)No.13585 of 2008-P

  = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

       Dated this the 30th day of July, 2008.

                     JUDGMENT

1.The petitioner was elected to the committee of

the second respondent society. That election was

set aside by the Co-operative Arbitration Court

as per Ext.P1 at the instance of the third

respondent who, by that award, was declared as

the duly elected candidate.

2.This writ petition was filed on the allegation

that there was none to entertain the appeal filed

before the Kerala Co-operative Tribunal, owing to

the vacancy of the Deputy Registrar/Secretary. As

of now, the appeal of the petitioner has been

numbered and it is listed to be taken in

November, 2008. But the fact remains that the

committee to which the election was held would be

in office only for some time in January, 2009.

WP(C)13585/2008 -: 2 :-

This means that having regard to the expediency

of election matters, the Tribunal has to make

every effort to finally dispose of the case, at

least, in November, 2008. In view of the

different decisions of the Apex Court governing

interim orders, it is directed that while the

third respondent, on the strength of Ext.P1,

will be entitled to officiate as a member of the

committee of the second respondent, he will not

participate in the discussion of any policy

matters or have the right to vote in such

matters. The interim order granted in this case

is vacated and the writ petition is ordered as

above directing that the Tribunal will decide

the matter finally before the end of November,

2008 and the parties will be entitled to move

the Tribunal with the copies of this judgment

for appropriate listing of the matter by pre-

poning the posting, if necessary.

THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN,
JUDGE.

Sha/300708