High Court Kerala High Court

V.O.Augustine vs The State Of Kerala on 19 March, 2008

Kerala High Court
V.O.Augustine vs The State Of Kerala on 19 March, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 9357 of 2008(L)


1. V.O.AUGUSTINE, S/O.OUSEPH,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. V.D.PAULY, S/O.DEVASSY, AGED 46 YEARS,

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,

4. THE SECRETARY,

5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,

6. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,

7. THE MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT,

8. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

9. P.M.SHAMSUDHEEN, S/O.MAKKAR KUNJU,

10. RAHMATH CHARITABLE TRUST,

11. MOTHER SUPERIOR, ST.JOSEPH'S

                For Petitioner  :SRI.PAUL K.VARGHESE

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

 Dated :19/03/2008

 O R D E R
                            PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J.
                        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                            W.P.(c).No. 9357 OF 2008
                    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                   Dated this the 19th day of March, 2008

                                  JUDGMENT

I do not propose to go into the merits of the matter. The

grievance voiced by the petitioners who are said to be agriculturists

engaged in cultivation of paddy is that respondents 9, 10 and 11 are

illegally filling up vast areas of paddy fields and that though complaint

was submitted before various authorities, no action has been taken.

Ext.P4 is the copy of the complaint submitted by the petitioners before

various authorities including the Revenue Divisional Officer,

Muvattupuzha who is the competent authority under the land utilisation

order. It is conceded that on entertaining Ext.P4, respondent No.3 has

forwarded the same to respondents 5 and 6 for report.

I dispose of the writ petition directing the third respondent to

finalise the proceedings he has initiated on the basis of Ext.P4 with

notice to the petitioners and also to respondents 9 to 11 at the earliest.

At any rate, reports should be obtained and further enquiry if necessary

WPC.No.9357/08 2

be conducted and orders shall be passed on Ext.P4 by the third

respondent within two months of receiving a copy of this judgment.

PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE
JUDGE

sv.

WPC.No.9357/08 2