V.P.Rajeswari Amma vs Ramachandran on 31 March, 2010

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 103 of 2006()


1. V.P.RAJESWARI AMMA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. RAMACHANDRAN,
                       ...       Respondent

2. SREEDEVI.R,

3. THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JOHN BRITTO

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.R.MURALEEDHARAN

SHRI.M.R.RAJENDRAN NAIR (SR.ADVOCATE)
SHRI K.J.THOMAS STANLEY(RETD.ADDL.DIST.JUDGE)

 Dated :31/03/2010

 O R D E R
                  SRI.M.R.RAJENDRAN NAIR
           (SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA)
                             AND
                         SRI.N.V.RAJU
                     (MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE)
        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                  M.A.C.A NO.103 OF 2006
        - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
           DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 2010


                        A W A R D



    Settled. Vide report of settlement.




                                       M.R.RAJENDRAN NAIR
                                        (SENIOR ADVOCATE)




                                           SRI.N.V.RAJU
                                        (MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE)


ss/.


? IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

+WP(C).No. 17263 of 2008(E)


#1. JOSEPH, S/O.OUSEPH, KOTTOOR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



$1. SONY JOSEPH, PUTHUVAL NIKARTHIL,
                       ...       Respondent

2. TOMY JOSEPH, PUTHUVAL NIKARTHIL,

!                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.R.VENKETESH

^                For Respondent  :SRI.ROY CHACKO

*Coram
 The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.JOHN MATHEW (RETD.JUDGE)
SMT.K.SREELATHA DEVI (RETD. DIST.JUDGE)

% Dated :06/04/2010

: O R D E R

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.JOHN MATHEW
(RETD JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA)
AND
SMT.K.SREELATHA DEVI
(RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE)

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

W.P.(C) NO.17263 OF 2008

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2010

O R D E R

Petitioner, second respondent and their counsel are

present. The parties have agreed to settle the main dispute

accepting the C1(a) plan on the trial side which is appended to

the decree in the second appeal 979/1973. Parties also agree

that the property may be measured and divided inaccordance with

that plan by the Taluk Surveyor. The Taluk Surveyor Cherthala is

directed to survey and demarcate the property inaccordance with

Ext.C1(a) plan and file a report before this Adalat. Parties

will produce all necessary records along with a copy of this

order before the Taluk Surveyor for compliance. Post on

27.05.2010.

Sd/-

K.JOHN MATHEW
(RETD. JUDGE)

Sd/-

K.SREELATHA DEVI
(RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE)

ss/.

//True copy//

P.A to Judge