BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATE: 18/12/2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition(MD)No.13478 of 2009 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2009 V.Palus .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Home Secretary, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9. 2.The Director General of Police, Beach Road, Chennai - 4. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District. 4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thukalay, Kanyakumari District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Arumanai Police Station, Kanyakumari District. 6.Mr.Pathmanapanpillai The Sub-Inspector of Police, Arumanai Police Station, Kanyakumari District. 7.Rajaiyan Head Constable, Arumanai Police Station, Kanyakumari District. 8.Mr.Mohankumar .. Respondents Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 4 to 7 not to harass the petitioner and his family members without any legally sustainable complaint. !For Petitioner ... Mr.S.Rajasekar ^For Respondents R1 to R5 ... Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Government Advocate * * * * * :ORDER
Heard Mr.S.Rajasekar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and
Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, the learned Government Advocate, appearing for the
respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of Mandamus, to
direct the respondents 4 to 7 not to harass the petitioner and his family
members, without any legally sustainable complaint.
3. The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents
1 to 5 had submitted that the petitioner and his family members are not being
harassed. However, it has been stated that the 5th respondent had to conduct
the investigation, in respect of the complaint lodged by the 8th respondent
against the petitioner. The petitioner had been called for an enquiry two
months back. However, the petitioner has not been called to appear before the
5th respondent, thereafter. If necessary, the petitioner would be requested to
appear before the 5th respondent, as and when further investigation is to be
done.
4. In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate
appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 5, since no further orders are
necessary, the writ petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition is also closed.
cs
To
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Represented by the Home Secretary,
Fort St. George, Chennai – 9.
2.The Director General of Police,
Beach Road, Chennai – 4.
3.The Superintendent of Police,
Kanyakumari District.
4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Thukalay,
Kanyakumari District.
5.The Inspector of Police,
Arumanai Police Station,
Kanyakumari District.
6.Mr.Pathmanapanpillai
The Sub-Inspector of Police,
Arumanai Police Station,
Kanyakumari District.
7.Rajaiyan
Head Constable,
Arumanai Police Station,
Kanyakumari District.