High Court Kerala High Court

V.R.Pradeep vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
V.R.Pradeep vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 32349 of 2008(A)


1. V.R.PRADEEP, S/O.V.K.RAGHAVAN,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. J.SULFIKAR ALIKHAN, KHAN MANZIL,
3. G.BABU, S/O.GOPALAN NAIDU,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.G.ARUN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN

 Dated :26/11/2008

 O R D E R
                       P.N.RAVINDRAN, J
                       -----------------------------
                W.P.(C) NO: 32349 of 2008
                       -----------------------------
             Dated this 26th day of November, 2008

                            JUDGMENT

Heard Sri.T.R.Harikumar, the learned counsel appearing

for the petitioner and Sri.Alexander Thomas, learned Standing

Counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. The petitioners are candidates included in the

supplementary list forming part of Ext.P1 ranked list, which

came into force on 29.12.2006. In this writ petition they pray

for a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the first

respondent to report all the existing vacancies of Typist Grade

II to the Commission.

3. Sri. Alexander Thomas, the learned Standing Counsel

appearing for the Kerala Public Service Commission submits

that the main list of Ext.P1 ranked list was exhausted on

19.9.2008, when the last candidate in the main list was

advised. The learned counsel submits that the supplementary

list cannot therefore be operated. Reliance is placed on the

decision of the Apex Court in Nair Service Society Vs.

Kerala Public Service Commission-2003 (3) KLT 1126 SC

in support of the said contention.

WPC:32349 OF 20087
2

4. The Apex Court has in Nair Service Society Vs. Kerala

Public Service Commission (supra) held that after the main

list is exhausted the supplementary list cannot be operated. In

the light of the authoritative pronouncement of the Apex Court in

Nair Service Society Vs. Kerala Public Service Commission

(supra), the petitioners who are included in the supplementary

list cannot seek or be granted the reliefs prayed for by them. This

writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed.

P.N.RAVINDRAN,
JUDGE

bps