High Court Karnataka High Court

V Rama Rao vs State By The Secretary Labour … on 2 September, 2008

Karnataka High Court
V Rama Rao vs State By The Secretary Labour … on 2 September, 2008
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
IN THE HIGH mun? ox? KARLHATAICA,  

13ATE:;:3 THIS THE 2ND my 01:' sEPrEM%15'EflRv2T:3£§'S% T  _  

BEFORE

THE,' :~10m3LE MR. JIISTICE RAM%M0HVAr£1§ED13?"%% 

WRIT PETITION NO. 1*7é{2G 0F 2eb6{}:.--1§§§s)

BETW I-BEN

V RAMA RAG   '

AGED ABOUT68 Y'-EARS '     
THE MANAGING ;:>IRgc:1'oiR"' '   
MYSORE C,G}?}?EE--..Ci}RI«I§{3{WORK$ H»

um, §<;"'i$2i'i2'0.A{:1,,J*§?§5'r;{11§§Ar.3A§éV%i5'C}sT
CHICKMAGALUE';"§f'f"F10'2_ ._ ~ ~
 . % ~      PETITIGNER

(:33: 3:1 : A §zm:';sI:§;aN1--::AR"'sa J G KUMBAR, ADV)

    ~~~~~ 

..x.g..-......

     SECRETARY

'  LAEif";3UF2:= DEPARTMNET
 v1DHA;*NA SOUDHA, VIDHANA VEEIJHI
" BMIGALQRE 1

V' " 2..  DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISISONER

 HASSAN DESTRICY, KR PURAM EXTENTION
" HASSAN

1' " -3 am KURUVANGI BHAGYA

AGED ABQUT 50 YRS
W] O SR1 RANGASHETTY
R] O C] O AITUC OFFTCE, TAMEL

COLONY, CIHICKMAGALUR 9 R
if

 



SMT KURUVANGI SAKAMMA
AGED ABOUT 40 YRS
W/O SR3 SANNASIDDAPPA   ~

R/O <3/0 AITUC OFFICE, 'I"AMIL ,,  j; 

COLONY, CHHEKMAGALUR

Sm' KURUVANGI PUS¥"€P:A~».,V_
Aem ABOUT 42 YRS '  '
W/O SR1 sHANKARAPPA_.s1&'v§.%mr

R/O C/O AITUCV OFFICE, TAi'.§._iI; 

COLONY, c:H1cK:vmGAwE§,';,

KURUVANGI R J£;'r'1'='x§v¥.§flA" 
AGED AB<3.U*'_i'-- 5:2:,YR.s....' ' .  1 --
Wm 35:: R.?_{M_EG£}W{)A  ig ,
R/O C/Q'-AI"r'U--C bGF'P'ICE,V'TAMIL
:::0L0z~.1 Y*,»-.G;;11CI:MAGAw'R 

$9.4? BEL£j:éj'¥.;fm:«sAN3fHA '
AGED AB'QU*i'.,'47 'Y'-.._R__.'.*3« 
w/0Ls:21,,sH:vgN':xIA,.'%~

_ R/0 Cm A§T?UC"O¥'FiCE, TAMIL
. COLONY, 'c:..HV:1cKrvIAG,ALUR

 Li}?-E SANNA PUTTAMMA

 AGED PJ_3C}}.J'I' 50 YRS

 ,W;«<'3-.s'R1j NANJAPPA

" R/Q' cm AITUC OFFICE, TAMIL

 cmoziiv, CHICKMAGALUR

19

am' LiNE HONNANIMA

KAGED ABGUT 51 YRS
PW/{J SR1 SEETHARAMU

R/O c/0 AYTUC OFFICE, TAMIL
COLONY, CHICKMAGALUR

SM'? KURUVANGI GAYATHRI
AGED ABOUT 45 YRS
W/O SR1 NAGAPPASETY } E

PL./'

 



1}.

22

13

14

  

R/C} C/O AITUC OFFICE. TAMIL
GOLONY, CHICKMAGALUR

SMT LINE B SHARABA

4'? YRS, W/O SR1 CEANDRASHEYFY
R/O C/O AITUC OFFICE, TAMIL
COLONY, CI-IICKMAGALUR

SMT. KURUVANGI RUKKAMMA' . 
38 YEARS, W/O. ONKARASHEITY A. f:
12/0 (3/0 AITUC OFFICE, TAMIL'~._
COLONY, CHICKMAGALLIR " "

swrr HOSAHALLI GANGAWQIA

46 YRS, 'W/O CHANNABA«SAPPASHE1'I"Y" 

R/O c/0 AITUCVQFEFICE, '1fAb/:.1_L. '~--«_
COLONY, CHICKM:";GALtj R--. A} " " 

SM'? KTU22i13VAm.;1.'L9LAM--MA
AGED .a...B(;i.=;j*rA%47 1- '

wfo 53:21 GAV':SH'E'I;*Y'<. 
R/(Z}'(§/'O_A}'I'_UC C}FE'ICE, TAMIL

_C;{)L(f)i\EY;' CHE-CKMAGALUR

":~s;:A»€:1* LINE xiéijmiinl

Assam ABOUT 46 YRS

   mg :*-;''m_ EQKKSHMANAGOWDA
_   ,2; £3"_~€3_/AITUC omca, TAMIL
 _ ' :::,c)_1,c;:ssrfs.r; CHICKMAGALUR

 16

 KI} IUPENAHALLI SHA§?ADA

40'~"YRS, W/O SR1 SHADAKASHAFH

'A 'J 3/0 (3/0 AITUC OFFICE, TAMIL

..'CC)LONY, CHICKMAGALUR

SM'? KURUVANGI LALITHA

AGED ABCLKJT 36 YRS

W/O SR1 LOKASHETTY

R] O C] G AITUC OFFICE, TAMIL
COLONY, CHICKMAGALUR 

 



petitioner 5}; filing statement 0f objecfions. 'I'?1.&¢;_"* 

Labour Commissioner, Hassan by order (.'1E;1'[£'f§_"'   

Annexure K allowed the app1icatio1;':ii1c1 «issi;cd_:tI§{€:v 

for recavery of i?S.4,42, 138/ -. Hencée,'  2 V' 

2. Learned counsel for'£l;1g§.._I;;etifiGne1' V is' his 2  j'

submission that respondents ito_:_18V¢V hafing  3 claim

for recovery of the ” the azeiflement

dtd.26.04.2000, A.Annex11rq:;;,} application on

26.9.2fio5 (3_fSeC.33(C) of the Act, without
filing ” time beyond the period of

fimitatéon ._r1«:1:’r:iéii’ 1″zom the emplvyer, as set out in the

to the said section, the Deputy Labour

Czc;::;ainissic31:§::;’; Hassan, entertained the ciairrn for issue of the

“V.,.c:ertiafir:.:afE: without authority of law and the entire proceeding

V’ is fiitiated as being one without juxisdictiotz.

3. Leanied counsei for respondents 3 to 18 dams not

tiitmute the fact that no application was filed showing

1J”(

amount in deposit is directed to be refunded to the.

alongwith an application.

csg