High Court Karnataka High Court

V Shyamanna vs State Of Karnataka on 20 October, 2009

Karnataka High Court
V Shyamanna vs State Of Karnataka on 20 October, 2009
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh


IN mm mm comm or nmzm-Am arr

mu-an arms ms 20″ rm’ or ocwoszn, 2069:’

swans

am 1%-1::n~:’n:.s HR.€flI8’1’I£.’iE ..

cmxnm. PETITION REV);-.§§;*’.92/2.C}C3__9.’
nmrwzm ‘ ”

1 V st-Hmmmm
s/0 vmcamsumx
AGED A8061.’ 4,5»7£E.AR£F: :

we mm cams, %
c %   k  L
a.=mamnz...,_       .%    

2 mmzasfi 
MED MOM.' '50  " &
n/0 19TH.._cms3« 

c.v.mmr:%«1xman%_mo;«,~~k nmazuona.

AE»£;B”.RB£?U’1’_2′-QYEARS.
.1/.9 mm ,. IQGI.-ERDASAPURA.
(‘E .v;: P . 0.

; . . . mrnzozqzns

A’g’%”a1~n awma A H Ram-mruufinm, ADV93

%’VTi%’*–svgé:mVor mnmmra
%’%«m%” Im,
” 32 rm ptrmc 9&3,

wwww W.-Mllflfifl W?” WAflHWH¥M£kM W%K7W MQJWNE WW seswuwmzmmsm WWWW W-afiflwufiflfi W3?” aammzwemwmw W?”-‘W”‘$ mwwvm WW %MKNMKM?U% Wfiwm mwwww WW flflflmfiififlfl WEUN We

\W

_____ -. yum -….u……,. _.¢_u…..«m-_..

m- {u#T”u_um ww.u–wwmmqvrmnaitufl-‘ ll-i\l§’Hi’ ‘u’a\dlhfl’l\§ MIT ¥\sf’&fl¥Vl”‘lIP¥I\”.’ rtllzifl \i”‘JfiI’ til’

CITY CIVIL CGURT CQKPLEX,

nwmom . . . . RESPOHDm¢_’I?_ “‘ 5 7. [_f f

(By Sri: mmppa, aces

cm”? 312.519 U/s.433 _ %L:1§§.§.c’:%v%% M«A ”
ADVOCATE now. In

Immm cwm my 33 Tc: term
PETR8. on 3311., ARREST
IN exam No. 367/2039 *9: POLICE
STATIGN, 1$;u}”s”% am an or
sc/st’ inibcrwms} ACT. mm U/S
323 or

on mm 93% ms
Izmir, ranmwms:

V T. Plunder is di::ec:tad ta

M…

H The patitionara have seught for grant an:

‘ “~,.._ _ginticipatczy bail in connectiun with crime

N’o.38’?f2fi€J9 of ltahadmnpuxa. Po1i<:e Station,

W"

Li”h»’

mmm MWHNK WP WWKNHWNWH WEEK??? WWW”? 5.3%” Mflfimfififlflfifi Wflwfl mwmum WV Wwfififiwflfiflfififl Wawm wwwma WW’ mmmlwmmmmm 9E”M\;W”9 mwrwma W! awfinxvmammwm mummy

for the allfltzfid cttamaoa Punishahle under
Section; 3(1) (X) of the SC/ST (Prevention

Atroéitias) Act and undar Soctian :f¢23*~mf’.’ V

3. on 26-9-2009 mum 10.06- §;.m.,

A cawgzlainarxt was ;:aa’$’i:’–ii1»L._£rort1tvv–a£v~V3

his house, the petititmofi
the complainant .{m%jg;1:nyL out
the name of hi:.’§ ::i§&id”‘4Vto have
assaulted have also
taken. quid -of Rn.2,800/-
from the ”

the learned Gaverwt

h’ wleurnad Ccunael for the
having regard tea the mast

at the case, since the
section amtxl of the salsa’
at Atmaities Act has grmt at

Qintiaipatory bail. it ‘in far the petitioner: to

EX’

Mvwnw mm-mum ‘-‘cau<'«u:{W;nrfi'amw was wwmmwwwmwmawm nnewvnn wwwmm Wfi"' ummmwwmnmmm %""MMv.'-'5F£"§ mvwmz Nit?' |F%.l'"\K5'$I"§E$'"°3.%#'7§¢ WKWW %.aJwWJN.J2 "ml?" Mfiflfiiwfifiiiffififlffl KIIWEI %%

£119 a ragular bail application hg;{$$:é:"Lj'-.T§Eha

Special Gaunt: for Atrocities by
or the bail. petition. "it'.:£§x~'.i'A«t1ia V
Special Ceuxt to con§ide£«.__ . cf

patitiana: far grand: V

suitable conditimzxg H3'ma*§day or

next day.

5. is allowed.

saf-

jUDGE