High Court Karnataka High Court

Vaibhav Arora vs State Of Karnataka on 25 February, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Vaibhav Arora vs State Of Karnataka on 25 February, 2010
Author: L.Narayana Swamy


«#”vc:12#”‘6h\$»’£”‘Vh

Haw” »wwwa~§g_.w¢:r wvmmmwwm WWW mwfiwm W?” Kmfimflfififififim Hfififl €Jfi3@,§§€:”T Q?’ %§fifiWfiT?;?3$;fi}& §*§%€f3%§~§ fifiiig §?{.§§a§§?;7fvEé~55€a,’W%Ka% Mfiflfl mam

A BALLYTEcI~m _
‘ N 1i1’£i§(E:Pi;TGR Emma

I1? TTE MGR CGUF1’ 0? KAREATAEQQ AT BAR%L$RE

mmm ms tam 25%: may :31? mnmamr

BEWRE

Tm HGWBLE 1sm.JUs’ricE L.xgm¥A:m; _ J %

E

VAHBHAVARQRA,
AGEDABW 2? YEARS~,._

S[€3P.I.1.ARQR£&; Li A
azmaawaanx HAGAR, = ‘

(BY sat. H.T.I§&Kg’;§’jsH: %
swag
1 %%%y¥mt1*~EA arxmyamm

] ~. % “e:I;YEER mm POLICE s’ra:z:§H,
A _ kccmg sagzcgamm,

an-sum
333$ FVT1 E513”;

7

“‘~\xM'”‘ ?,”‘m锑$f6’VL~§*4€£”\#§é*”€s€Vufl”*fir. i¥'”?£fi%3P%”‘§9 “wMK*’&/Wflrli %m*’!li'” fi”1:’¢”‘9.B*’%MW’i&””‘i?<5t$°*'9afl'\-J5"%fi D?'"$E't»3§'E€"'$ "huz'€w»'"5m£'l¥%.5! WWW &i"¥§'£%$'E"'i£ V%y.r"e..v3'Ta«§!'<'é.

Tlrfifi CRL.P IS FREE U! 3.432 €R..PgC BY TIE
ADVQCATE FOR Tim PE’I’fFIC}NER PRAYEFG
TI-ES I~i0H’31£ CQIRT’ MAY BE PLEASEQ TE

Tm mmmnmss rs cane. mzsazzoog
ma; 0? I 1&I}DL.$I>&M BAHGAJQRE Arm

TI-E CASE.

111% Girl. Pctiaian is serum $1 f?;’;_>’:t’

tlrmfimzrtmadn ma folbwmg .

mponam: anmg
am tbs an act of
that he
waufi. avaida ‘£1:

contact ‘$3 many aawasiam

V the wfit ascmi w wxify Ittimg aha

him but wtztmuafi ta

§Emi§ar
rwyarxim 3% af amatim: maé

k % am; am; 25% sepmm 2933 by mm a-mg

Y%.§”‘&E§d§.”‘1&¢$% MW» WW3 %”L¥ §i’?1\.~§«”?§/3″?’ \«ys*i<»;J 7&6? "PK 3'

S:-ime km Smfim at

finer W M5 ?§'<;$$ %-i' E" fi"a.1¥*§'aE"v1$'<%;a&*=%Efi*$§&«:i5'§: %'""§ aw W3? §'~«..»'%.#' $53 N 1% ~fif'U1"'

2* '% mt arm Eta

ammm tim af 6'? af -=;;_:.i%:'::;;;.;=:,_s=;

%,§§’§°¥’ §%bR%’é&”§’$Al§€fia §~%?§$é%-§ mm

W 2<:.v»*¢mv':¢:a wwsrvwm

rs:

E
27%
fin:


5%
35
$§a
%
$
3
ag
2
Q?

2

§
Q
3
§
&
3*
§
§
3
,2
3
2
2
§
i
E
§
E

1% pzzzmhabke eficnee far mm mm whmz may wfmxd

m S 32% ané am Rm}. 13% fag? fimpmfifi.
it wank be punfishabla with 8. fins ofRs.10 ‘ ;-I if

3. Am mvmttagmon, zm%p51me
I B! in , .

C.C.Hc.2’2′?&3i2%. Afim
complaint and also mm
the pefitimna was heft.-arre
Court. p.-mm-rm!
this pefifiofi. -_ .

mm m mg

_ w Aéwmhe. ‘Wm rm mafia E
‘both tha wax haw am. pm

seem; as (if m: Infcrmfimi

_ Act. rad wfih 482 Ma 32% afC»r.P.3.,

%\45’~3’z»§t$’~§$a.é”-53¢ NEWW kg $4.3 5&5

*3
2%-c
$34:

J
M
‘*9:

(-,$’

2.

%
:9

is
9′
ésw
‘W4
2»;

22.5′
V.-8

V:a”‘§L i2″”7&£E%é’5§'”‘£! MMFWWE %.fl7l£”” %’M$’*”%<}i'%l%"%"3'°§.%§J§"é.32"§.A"?5; l.E'"73.

‘€w Wm” M? 53% $5 *-‘e;;-3-17

ii.’sL..t°°”‘$ 3&1? Q’cel””‘s’e 3} 2?”‘%b”\>ui2″”A if ‘C E Ms’-5 E” I\’ ‘IN Xnfi’ ‘R5 9% 2 _.W«& E ” 6.’~’%.as””‘$.s’7″§. 9: :’£’M”-“‘ 3”; 5.

Itizaubmiflbytlfmpsfibflfismfi

it csfiieme E fimt 6:? Rs am and mm if _

fifitkd for the w =

Swtfaon 63 of tlmaot. Tbs: A ‘A
‘m para No.5 mm, ?m View af mé a¢.<;m 1

$969311: Ha.2 has in km
future am in casg::'shse Qourt

He arm. mm by tha

_ h

v

L53 éf :.m:.m aka #1:, vm ax" gm ma that am
' W H 'A £§a3;.::':§ gum" umiw Sam' 21 49% $13932, whzzfi

W.» «W 'ow-'

W .W.,W.mWm WW WW: W mm-mmm mmw €.';%;;m§§"§°" Emm=w.*§';aeam §~»:§2:;:§=»'z attmmm" W mmmmm MWW WW

8.; I hem gem thmugh aha mmiimt mafia

by the xfindsnt 313.2 mé; éz Eu an
puxéahame as mnxmpaam in the Act, but in % f% % f _
the ram hath parfim are
emafitznal Iemmamx-.1 it is
wfiozm is

mm but im the erxtigof

¢ I
sectam mm at’ the
tmw arxiabject szzf

fhe Iawis the fihuia, rathwr than

Y we

V V fifim apfir b&e the
Acmm zseamaue

% %

g ….

qmlm. in $356 bath esfthm aammfi my act Eka
thfm afi% by way {if %’£:i&n§ firm am waged new
shafi Mane! tsarmimtsé. _. ” ~’ L” A
Criminal” Pa ” n arm: a¥;a%;§{i”

HB$,!$E

Efimgé £33.,” §£im§§_.§.m§ $3 fligfiufi Qafifi £é§g§§,§§.§ $3 m§§.33_, $933,.” §}§§§_w§.§$§§ sgazy NW5? .,….3 iaii §.,£§_a§§fi§.§ w.¢.:23§§ ¢,%£§;§§§,§§& if}. _:g3§§