Karnataka High Court
Vaikund Property … vs The Asst General … on 3 June, 2009
IN THE HIGH comm' 012' KARNATAKA AT BANGA1;§3':é'E,T:
DATED THIS THE 3rd DAY OF JUNE M39,
Pi?ESEN'I' ;
THE HON'I3LE MR. 13.1). DIfi¥AKAiI€?A!\E.;;_A-CHIEF
THE'. HOBVBLE MR.JU$Ti{§E._V';.{}.SAI3}£A§iIfIE
WRIT PETrfi0f{ .NC).1?3€%98i';_?(fl):G9_
BETWEEN: '
1 v;u%KU:~: I3' PRCZvP§',I?'JY- DEVELGPMENT (PVT) LTD
A1CQMPANY..V_R'EGi'ST'ER§€B AND INCORPORATED
U'N_DE'.R 'TH E~.coMPANI'E:s ACT 3956,
ANIIHAVING £'I'$ Q-TFECE AT
RAM LAKSHMAN_ APARTMENTS No.39,
; azaaoum, Roan}. V.V.PURA
BA_N€3}LAOfi'E 4}__,___REP.BY rrs MANAGING
1}§~I€E3{;?TOR, MR R.V.NA'I'HAN.
2' 1 5»i§&'--«R.'"{?.§!4§_5fHAN
U LA'f'E VRAJARAMAN
R/f'a.'7£'.i'g_i£§>.2{)5, RAM LAKSHMAN A
" AI4'EsR'I'MENTS NCL89,
DIAGONAL ROAD, V.V.PURAM,
' ~ BANGALORE 4. PETITIONERS
"gm Sn: GIRIDHAR 5:. co. )
" WLNI) :
1 THE ASST GENERAL MANAGER
/AU'}'I~IGRISED OFFICER , . _
IHMAN BANK, M.G.ROAQ,BRAN{3H,I ' '
NO.13.0, UNITED MANSIONS '
M.G.ROAD, . "
BANGALORE 560 001. RESPQN'*DE'N'I"" "
(By Sri:KESI~IAV BHAT, ;..ADVOCP.'§§E.--. -»;;_
THIS w.P. £8 FILE}i) ' 1?1=:AiY1!\:{;;..,'1*{_>_ QLIASH THE
ORDER PASSED BY THE" pasrf R'?1*3C€;'Xf'§}PéiY APPELLATE
'I'RiBUNAL, cagrmal m;"2?v.4420:'r9_ IN'.R,A'. (SA) 149/2008
Arm CONSEQUERTLY i:3I$Mz"ss4v'r}1.E»V,sA1D APPEAL FILED
BY THE RESPf'flfiI§fE}I'_JT'v3AN'i<::
"%a'E{1 fi': for Preliminaxy Hcaiing
on this "day,"SABHAHIT_J'.,_iILad:: the following.
, E R
Thisx vzfit filed haing aggrieved by the
2 judvgi1iz.e3;f apd passed by Debt Recov:-:13' Appellate
"I'Vi¢ib111;z::1, (;E:.¢1=a;éi12after called 'the: Tribunal') Chennai dateti
I$% .2L(S,.A.)149/2008. The Writ petitioners have
'V "iv?-:gr§ i1ashing of the order passed by the Tfibunai
u §"}'.4.2009 and for 3. ciirczction t0 the Bank not to
-- ix-1Vt'é1'f£'¢:rc=: with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the
T '";§é'Q'£iox1er No.2 in scheciule-B pr(3perty.
V)'
2. it is I.'-1V6I'I'E:(Z1 in thfi petition that gas
the pr(3{:eediI1gs-Ixiéiarl Bank I'e;31*es<§3t;tc:cL-- '4'*.¥§{Lth9fis¢d'_'V J, T T
Oflicer initiated proceedingza beiinjc [Debi
Tribunal, Bmgalore in Orighai Apfifiafificg N$;3f§3 for
recovery of a sum of :« the
financial assi$tanceAV_eXtem'1gg1:T" was
secured by way 0'-Vf interest in
the land and immovable property
bearing Bangalore, which
property schedule-A to the writ
petitien and i;:1 addi'ti.O;:_, scéond petitioner is a Guarantor
the sttcond petitioner is the sole
of the apaxtmcznt bearing No.2(}5. Ram
Lakshman %A13;q'%jrm11'A"%;¢nts, N089, Diagonal Raad, V.V.P1m.am,
4i3~;anga1(;I:€;,V"'.§fl1i c:h is morefilliy described in schedule-B
the pendency of O.a.No.36§/2602
'-:t:s;AppfidQént~Bank proposed to issue a notice uncier Section
"-4 1':3'(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2092 by notice dated 26.9.2005.
;I'he petitioners filed detailed objections to the notice issued
\/'
under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act _
considering the oiajections, the :espQ;1dent~Ba;i*.1{:fi;§jree§tent:g§"
to proceeei against the schedule
the petitioners were constrained to challenge en. ,
the part of the nespon¢i'ea.:1;'t4Ban_ k ifisfimting
W.P.No.2604«8/2005 begfdre :'his:_ :55 Jsaicl writ
pefifion was (iisposed pf directing the
::espondent~--Ba_;nk' 'cor§:sider».V~fhé~s§ a?id-- Vobgecfions and to take
appropxiiéfe 'AdAe?:;isie:i;'"ixi'"s§rict eémfiliance with the Act aad
Rules éito' same as expeditiously as
possible, of two months from the date
of ceijy n_f___thc csrder, if not aiready disposed of.
I-:feWever_, "abjeéitfions of the petitioners were :10': considered a3
the issued in the Writ petition and notification
; isie§;;;e€§.;1fi£ier Sectien 13(4) of the smzpgasz Act. Aggrieved
..¥3},~.ee¢;;;e Vvwgossession notice dateé 16.6.2066, the petitioner
.' proceedings before the Debt Recovery Triblmai
"under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2092 which was
registered as ASA.N0.1?1/2006. The respo3:1deI1t~Bank
\.--»"
4. The learned Counsel appeérizgg 'f_0:'t' i3:é.'t:'
submitted that the petitio1:ze;1".s_ hav6« i'1'o objcfiiiiétl Tori
1:*espondm1t-Ba1:1k to maiise: of
mortgaged property. . Hpwavéfg leéfiiéd counsel
submitted that responcijé'nVt+'Ba--i:1;"' against
the properties:..deiV$¥c;:ébe(1:AVV'§;:{ éihe writ petition.
For realisat36I'i'Vb_'<oif;'- gxstitioners in the first
iflstancc NGs.2(}2, 203 and
103 fmm the safe of the said flats
is not sufi'1c_ifé1;?;, '~'§rfit.:_".?petitionez's have no objection for
proceigfifiiiixg v1;1;§;«.sa1e of SChf:d12lfi~A pmperty which is
»inft}1_:t: Q¢c;1p%itiQ_n of the petitioners and apart from seeking
Writ pflfifioners are not gzursuing any
V ' othér mm this writ petition. Afifiavit of Sri.R.V.Na.tha:1
is '¥_i;1e Managklg Director 0f the first petifiener and
s¢'coa'd petitioner in this writ petition has been filed
-~n:3Viterating the sufamissions of {he iearneci cmmse}. appearing
V for the writ petiiioner magic before this court.
\5-
5. Copy of the amdavit has been served upoé;i.._»thc
counsel appearing for the respon€ient~Bank and
counsel appearing for the m$ponden'£--Bank V'
liberty may be reserved to the u
against schedule-«A property if the SQ: .'
the aificiavit filed by the writ is izgf: for " L'
satisfying the claim of the View of
the said mxbmission a1i{i t3:1.cé'-- _a1*§ic1s{{ii£'ffiied_ by the second
;r3eti'£io1j£€:f; ia;*e
The " first sell the property
comprisedApa1%t;aé11{S'.!§fo.2O2, 203 and 3.03 as ciescrdbed
= in afiidgvit fiiéci.hyrL:§1iR.V.Nathan~second petitioner who
Directsr of the first respondent and if
V cannot be sold or the amaunt realised by
the i$ net sufficient for satisfying the claim’ of
..theL—r¢s1;;(§nc¥cnt~Bank, it is open to the mspondent-Bank to
— against the gropcrty described in ‘A’ schedule to the
” petition. Apari from making the abcvc $a:id observations,
M
the writ petitioners are not entitied to any other
Writ peffiion.
Aacorciingly, the wrii peuti¢5:;, fis.V_;1is;5’o-sgav cgf,
above said observations. ‘
V’
Ifidisxz Ycss,/. T//””
._ J,
” Y€s/ No