High Court Kerala High Court

Valsala Kumary.L. vs The Joint Registrar Of … on 14 October, 2008

Kerala High Court
Valsala Kumary.L. vs The Joint Registrar Of … on 14 October, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 27881 of 2008(T)


1. VALSALA KUMARY.L., PUTHUVAL PUTHEN
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE
                       ...       Respondent

2. POOVATTOOR EAST SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE

3. THE SECRETARY,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SAJU.S.A

                For Respondent  :SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :14/10/2008

 O R D E R
                 THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
                ------------------------------------------------------
                      W.P.(C) NO. 27881 OF 2008 (T)
                ------------------------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 14th day of October, 2008

                               J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, a female, aged 39 years, has filed this writ petition

seeking a direction to the first respondent to direct the second respondent to

appoint the petitioner in an existing vacancy of Peon in the service of the

second respondent.

2. Second respondent notified two vacancies of peons and invited

applications; conducted the written test through an outside agency, held

interview and prepared a ranked list. The petitioner is the third rank holder

in that list. After the appointment of two persons to those vacancies, a third

vacancy arose during the currency of the ranked list. While the employer

cannot be compelled to make appointment, having regard to the fact that the

petitioner is now aged 39 years and is next in the select list, which already

available and live, it would only be worthwhile to appoint her as a Peon since

that will empower the petitioner, a female, in the marginalized sector, with

means for her livelihood and may loose such opportunity at a later point of

time on account of her age.

W.P.(C) No.27881/2008

– 2 –

Under such circumstances, it is ordered that, treating the petitioner’s

as a special case of an extra ordinary nature, the second respondent will

consider Exhibit P1 representation and issue order appointing the petitioner

as Peon, without delay, before the expiry of the rank list, which is in force.

This writ petition is ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN,
JUDGE

skr/15/10

// True copy //

P.A. to Judge.