IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 35653 of 2009(B)
1. VALSALA V.V., AGED 47 YEARS,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS
... Respondent
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,
3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
5. THE HEADMASTER, CVM HIGH SCHOOL,
6. CORPORATE MANAGER, LOURD MATHA HIGH
7. HEADMISTRESS, MOUNT CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL,
For Petitioner :SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
Dated :10/12/2009
O R D E R
T.R RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J.
-------------------------
W.P ( C) No.35653 of 2009
--------------------------
Dated this the 10th December,2009
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is working as High School Assistant
(Natural Science) in Mount Carmel High School,
Mamanna, Jellippara in Attapadi in Palakkad District.
Petitioner was promoted as High School Assistant
(Natural Science) with effect from 1.6.1998 and was
continuing in CVM High School, Vandazhi in Palakkad
District. During the academic year 2008-2009, the
petitioner became surplus and accordingly she was
deployed to 7th respondent school in Attappadi as per the
proceedings Ext. P1 issued by the 3rd respondent.
Accordingly she was relieved from the 5th respondent
school as per Ext.P2 and reported for duty in the 7th
respondent’s school.
2. Petitioner’s case in the writ petition is that the
said school is situated more than 150 kms away from her
house which is a hill track area. The climate conditions
therein is really adverse and it really affects her physical
condition. Further she is unable to look after the affairs
W.P ( C) No.35653 of 2009
2
of her family also and she is now suffering from facial
paralysis.
3. Pointing out that there is an existing vacancy in
the 6th respondent’s school, petitioner has filed a
representation before the Deputy Director of Education as
per Ext.P4. Petitioner prays that the same may be
directed to be considered, in accordance with law.
4. If Ext.P4 has been received and is still pending,
the 3rd respondent will take a decision after considering
various aspects pointed out by the petitioner, within a
period of one month from the date of production of a copy
of this judgment.
Petitioner will produce a copy of the writ petition
along with a copy of this judgment before the 3rd
respondent for compliance.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
T.R RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
JUDGE
ma
W.P ( C) No.35653 of 2009
3
W.P ( C) No.35653 of 2009
4