Gujarat High Court High Court

Varshaben vs State on 5 March, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Varshaben vs State on 5 March, 2010
Author: Ks Jhaveri,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/1328/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1328 of 2010
 

 
=========================================================

 

VARSHABEN
MAHENDRABHAI AMIN & 3 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 3 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
RK MISHRA for
Petitioner(s) : 1 - 4. 
MR JK SHAH, LD.ASST.GOVERNMENT PLEADER for
Respondent(s) : 1 - 2. 
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for Respondent(s) :    
                               MR MAMTA VYAS for Respondent
No.4. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 05/03/2010
 

ORAL
ORDER

During
the course of hearing, Mr.J.K. Shah, learned
Assistant Government Pleader, has submitted that in view of the
peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the
respondent-Director of Primary Education will decide the
representation of the
petitioners
at Annexure-F to the petition pursuant to the recommendation made
by the respondent-District
Education Officer within the time limit prescribed by this Court.

In
view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned
Assistant Government Pleader, the learned
advocate for the petitioners
does not press this petition and the same is disposed of as not
pressed.

It
is, however, made clear that the respondent
No.2 will decide the said representation
of the petitioners
within a period of six weeks from today taking into consideration
the recommendation made by the District Education Officer as well as
keeping in mind the policy of the State Government prevailing
as on today. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Notice is
discharged with no order as to costs.

Direct
Service is permitted.

(K.S.

Jhaveri, J)

Aakar

   

Top