E IN THE H101---I COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANe3A1'..gj.i§:~:'.:' " DATED THIS THE 17% DAY OF T' PREsENf THE I~ION'BLE MR. JUST}cE: K.$Rfi:E1);;i.A§ Rm THE HONBLE MR. ,.J':u~.sT1CE"A.'k..jy*§N1;Gof5ALA'VQGOWDA M.F.A. No.-I BE3TWEEN_ VASU qA"rHAN--NA, 3 AGE1)" AI30I.::? 43 1«:.A£<s;'- S /0. '--..POCVA " - . R/AT BOBBARYAQIIE)1).A'i-{OVUSE. POST: KATAPA1')Y,'"' _ _ ' UDUPI TAi--.41;K.V ' = 'V _ _ ' APPELLANT :{1B1{sR1 A: A.NA.NDA SHfi3TI'Y, ADVOCATE) " 'B::'RNAIiD A1.L:. KARWAR. N.K. DIES'I'RlC'i'. 'f2. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY 131).. BRANCH: RM. JOSHI BUILDING. LEMINSAGI ROAD. I~1Uf-31.1. 4% 3. SAN'I'HOSH V.. AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS. S/ O. VITTAL. R/O. AMDALLI. KARVVAR. UTTARA KANNADA. -_, ffi$$bMmmB (BYSRJO.MAHESH.ADVOCATEfKflQR2Tx 2 * 2 &ueiR3AREsERvEDy a'* 1wns IWFA IS rnLED'"ufsg?3(n }3fi fiiv. ACT zuyuNSrTHELnHxmu§NTANb}QyA§a1xnii)63102003 PASSED IN max: Ndqgv/mifo&?f$E,FHJ: OF THE LEARNED PRL»cmvugJUDQExfi§ibNjd&JwACt UDUPL PARTEY A;Ld§fiNQF'?fifi3"x§LAm45 PETHHNV FOR C0MPENS&fi§& Law} SEEfim¢;JENHANCEMENT (X? 'lA"h§s" on for hearing this day, SREIE}DI'IA..R BAG, J '.,_ dfifififered the foikowingz JUDGMENT
_V .Th.c:~.g:§pp_§311a11t./pemTione:r sustained f.ra.ct.ure of right,
~1.’ému1″, f:4_2fzCt:i:;x’éV 01″ mandibie with loss of teeth. in a II10t.{)1′
vt:}i’i<':}€– fc1(:t:.i"der1t..
A’ The oc.cu1″1’€m’:e of Ehe. aczcident, 11eg1ige1’ace of the
A”–§)fi'(«:9i’1ding; vehicle and the coverage of insuramze art: not in
V V ciisput.e. The appea} pertains only for t?l’1ha1’lC?€3H}{i’I11. of
c01np<-::1sati011_
-1
,3
The pei:ii.ioi’ier was working; as a mason and his income
is taken at Rs.300()/~ p.m. by the trial couri ap;)earsl”i,o be
sound and proper. The fracture of femur \V()LilCl~«~I1<fi'C€t.SS'E_ilfllj[
involve some amount. of permanent. disability. 'fOl.é1l body ' r
disability is assessed ai. 10%. Tliehincolnie li)ss:'pro13oriitJnafe
io disability would be Rs.300/-
On reappreciaiion of tbe-_:iae_t.s ai”idl_levidfence, the
petitioner is entitled “iow’ai~’ri_s pain and agony.
Rs. of amenities. Medical
bills – and odd. The petitioner is
2’§r’c1i1_E_€Cl lRs.lV’OO_O’.”‘3Ol/’.6 l”~’Cowai’ds ii’iedi.(:al and .inCidei1i.al
.__Rs.300’/’v—–éineoniel X 12 (morlihsl X 15(multiplier)m
V i’54OQO’,/fiis”ii g1*asni.ed loss of future earnings on account of
ldisal:>ili’1ly’.’xf’fllie {.)Cl,ll.l()i1€.I’ would be laid up for about 6
iiicinths… Rs.l8000/w is 2.»1wai’ded inwards loss of l.i1COEI1f3
:dii’r.ii1g laid up period. in all, the peiiiioner is em.ii’.led to a
compensation of Rs.232000/- as against Rs.l54000/~
awarded by the iribunal. On the enhanced eorxlpensatiori.
the interest payable is at 6% pa from the date of the
petition £111 paynlent. Accordingly. the appeai is allowed L”
the 1.em’1s indicated above.