IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RSA No. 1261 of 2005()
1. VASU, S/O.NEDIYEDATH APPU VAIDYER,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. KUTTIMALU, W/O.RAMAN,
... Respondent
2. DHAKSHAYINI, D/O.RAMAN,
3. BALAN, S/O.RAMAN,
4. SHANMUGHAM, S/O.RAMAN,
5. PARAMESWARAN, S/O.RAMAN,
6. PURUSHOTHAMAN, S/O. RAMAN,
7. SAKTHIDHARAN, S/O.RAMAN,
8. CHANDRIKA, D/O.RAMAN,
9. RAVI, S/O.RAMAN,
10. ACHU, S/O.MANATHALA KARUVAN APPU @
11. RAGHAVAN, S/O.MANATHALA KARUVAN APPU @
12. GANGADHARAN, S/O.AYINIPULLY VELAPPAN,
13. AMMU, D/O.KAPPUR KARUVAN SANKARAN,
14. SANKARAN NARAYANAN, S/O.MANATHALA
15. SAROJINI SANKARATHMAJAN,
16. LAKSHMI DEVI, W/O.VELAYUDHAN,
17. GOPALAN, K.S.R.T.C., EMPLOYEE,
18. RUGMINI, D/O.MANATHALA KARUVAN
19. MEENAKSHY, D/O.MANATHALA KARUVAN
20. DHANANJAYAN, S/O.MANATHALA KARUVAN
21. SEKHARAN,
22. GEETHA,
23. PRAKASAN,
24. SUBHADRA, WQ/O.KUTTINARAYANAN,
25. VALLY, W/O.MANATHALA KARUVAN KUJUNNI,
26. LAKSHMIKUTTY,
27. SOBHANA, W/O.OTHALUR SUBRAMNIAN,
28. PUSHKARAN, S/O.,MANATHALA KARUVAN
29. PREMATH, D/O.MANATHALA KARUVAN
30. INDIRABAI, D/O.MANATHALA KARUVAN
31. THANKAMANI,
32. KRISHNAKUMAR,
33. VIJITHA,
34. DEVAKY, W/O.BHARATHAN,
35. MANI @ SOMAN, S/O.BHARATHAN,
36. SINDHU SUBRAMANIAN, D/O.BHARATHAN,
For Petitioner :SRI.RAJIT
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
Dated :/ /
O R D E R
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
-------------------------------------------
R.S.A.No.1261 of 2005
-------------------------------------------
Dated this the 31st day of January, 2008
JUDGMENT
On 1.1.2008, two weeks’ time was granted to cure the
defects. The defects were not cured. When the case came in the
defect list on 17.1.2008, it was submitted on behalf of the
appellant that the defects are being cured. The case was
ordered to be posted on 25.1.2008, if the defects were not cured
by them. Apparently, the case was not posted on 25.1.2008. But
it was posted only today. Till now, the defects are not cured.
The counsel for the appellant seeks for further time. The request
is refused. However, showing utmost leniency, two weeks’ time
is granted to the appellant to cure the defects and to apply for
restoration of the second appeal.
The second appeal is dismissed for default.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
csl
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
OP NO.848/1995
JUDGMENT
28/1/2008