Veen Pani vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 13 July, 2010

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CWJC No.5214 of 1997
           VEENA PANI, wife of Gajendra Prasad Himanshu,
           resident    of   village    Paridah,   P.s.   Hasanpur,
           District Samastipur, at present posted as Head
           Mistress in Devi Pad Chaudhary Sahid Smarak Inter
           School (Miller School), Patna
                                          ...            Petitioner
                                      Versus
          1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
          2. The Commissioner cum Secretary, Department of
              Secondary, Primary & Adult Education, Vikash
              Bhawan, Patna
          3. The Director, Secondary Education cum Special
              Secretary, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna
          4. The     Regional     Deputy    Director,    Secondary
              Education, Patna (Miller School Campus)
          5. The District Education officer, Patna
          6. Mrs. Reena Narayan, wife of Ranjeet Sinha,
              I.P.S. Headmistress, residing at 'Anurag' Road
              No.2, Rajendra Nagar, Patna- 800016
          7. Mr.    Surendra    Singh,    Headmaster   Ghanshamyam
              Balika    Ucchaya    Vidhayalaya,    Khagaul   Patna
              transferred and posted as Headmaster, Millar
              School
                                         ...          Respondents.
                                 -----------

15. 13.7.2010 Mr. R.K.Shukla, learned counsel for

the petitioner, submits that by efflux of

time this writ application challenging an

order of transfer has become infructuous,

especially when the petitioner has already

retired from service.

Mr. Shukla, however, would point

out that there would be certain claim of the

petitioner with regard to payment of salary

for the period in which the order of

transfer had been stayed by this Court.

If that be so, it will be open for
2

the petitioner to agitate her grievance only

to the extent of claiming salary for the

aforesaid period.

With the aforementioned liberty,

this application is dismissed as not

pressed.

(Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)

Surendra/