Veerappa @Irappa S/O Mahadevappa … vs Smt Gadigevva W/O Fakirappa … on 25 February, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD

DATED THIS THE 25th DAY OF FEBRUA}§--'f.,   *' 

BEFORE

THE HON 'BLE MR.JUSTIC?EMSU'B'HA<S_I~I 'BAD; .  " 

WRIT PETITION Noéossf/2008  ..

c/w w.P.No.30'5v3s/2008;G~M--c1gg1.fi C"  C'

IN W.P.NO.30537/2008

BETWEEN:

1. VEERAPPAHRAPPA) T   .
s/o MAHADEVAPPA HAN-C;-IINAL: . ,  _ 
AGE 45 YEARS, OCC:,A(}'RICTJLTURE ; .. "
R/O BETADUR.,_ KUNL)GQL--,'f'ALUKA_"-- .. _ 

DIST. DHAEwA_;D'.  . *

2. SHIVANAND ,1  V 

3. sHEKHAPpA,=

s/oViM,AHADTEvA1EPA r1Arv{CH'1NA.L,.. 
AGE 33 YEARs, occ; AGRICULTURE
R/oa_BETADVUR,. '§{Ui\IDG*QL"TALUKA

DIST.' --DI*IARWAD'.w ~ ._ '2. __

s /;L)*1\/EAHADEVAPPA HANCHINAL.
AGE :31 YEARS;"OC.C.:. AGRICULTURE
R*,~'O BETADUR, KUNDGOL TALUKA

» 1"D_IST',DI:IARWAD.

  

Us/'o MAHADEVAPPA I-IANCHINAL
AGE :30 YEARS, occ: AGRICULTURE
R /o. BETADUR, KUNDGOL TALUKA,

 A ]3IST.'wDHARWAD.

V'    Sm'. PARAVVA, w/0 BASAPPA HANCHINAL

 AGE 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
F R / O BETADUR, KUNDGOL TALUKA,
" DIST. DHARWAD.



 

6. SMT. BASAVVA,
W / O MAHADEVAPPA HANCHINAL
AGE 73 YERS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
R/ O BETADUR, KINDGOL TALUKA
DIST. DHARWAD.

7. SMT. NEELAMBIKA,
W/O MALLAPPA MYAGERI    ' 
AGE 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE  f.
R/O NAREGAL, RON TALUKA,   R ' R
GADAG DIST. .

8. SMT. NIRMALA,
W/O NINGAPPA SHIVALLI
AGE 38 YEARS, OCC:,----AGRIC

R/O SULLA, HUBLI T5u;UKA.;
DIST. DHARWAD. ' 'T  '

ULTURE' " -» _ _

9. SMT.RATNA\/VA,  " 1 ..
w/0 SHANMUKHAPP.A N,n.R.THI. 'V  .. 
AGE 36 YEARs,v0cC,: AGRICULTURE V
R/0 SUI§;LA,VBr{U'BL{_TALLTKAL   ..
DIST. DHARWA;D. ''  .. 

1o.sMTj. MAHAI?E3VI,'i.4 4  .
w/o__BH_0JARA,MRAKERI; 1. '

AGE 28 YEARS, occ; ACHUCULTURE
R/O YALBURGA; KOPPAI: TALUKA
DIST. KOFPAL.   

 11.S:v:T. INDRAVVA',«... ..... 

A Two MALLANAGOUDA KATTI,
. 'AGE 26.YEAR.s, occ; AGRICULTURE

 _  R/0 N'ELAGU.DI_DA, KUNDGOL TALUKA

 <D_ISfF. DHARWAD.

" ._ D1$T."D;§ARwAD.

12. KASTI,-"R'I,-. 
D /0. MAHADEVAPPA HANCHINAL
» A AGE 22 'YEARS, occ: AGRICULTURE
' R/.0 BETADUR, KUNDGOL TALUKA

 PETITIONERS
(By Sri. CHANDRAMOHAN KALE, ADV. )

 



 

A .10

DIST. DHARWAD.

SI-IEKHAPPA,

S/O MAHADEVAPPA HANCHINAL.
AGE 31 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
R / O BETADUR, KUNDGOL TALUKA
DIST. DHARWAD.

KALLAPPA,(MU'I"I'U)
S / O MAHADEVAPPA I-IANCI-IINAL

AGE 30 YEARS, occ: AGRICULTURE '

R/O BETADUR, KUNDGOL TALUKA,

DIST. DHARWAD. ' V  I A I

SMT. BASAVVA, I  
w/0 MAHADEVAPPA HANCHINALI»

AGE 73 YERS, occ; A_GRICUL_"I_'_URE _U

R/O BETADUR, KINDGQL TALUKA. jé 

DIST. DHARWAD.

SMT. NEELAMBIKA,(NEE[;AVV!;\)A   I

W/O MALLAPPA MYAe§3ER1' * 

AGE 47 YEARs;;1Gcc:'AGR1'<:Ui;*i'URE 'V -

R/O NAREGAL,i'lRGR*TAI,UKA,   V
GADAG 131s'1.§-.f,  »  

SMT, RA'1'PIAV'JA-,..A * _  .. -
W/O 'sHANMLJKHAPPA.. __ 'ART-H1

AGE 36=YE2ARS',* occ: AGRICULTURE
R /O SULLA, HUBLI TALUKA,
DIS'T...DHARWAD. '

V"sMTi;."N1RMALA,  IIIII H
' --wV/oV NINGAPPA SHIVALLHKHARADI)

 I .AGE__3~8_ YEARS., OCC: AGRICULTURE

"R/0 sU]LL_A~,,HUELI TALUKA,

I' p1sT.v_DHA__RwAD.

' A  10. SMTJ MAHADEVI,
' Gw/OVVEROJARAJ ARAKERI,

I SAGE 28 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE

 I' -._R',/50 YALBURGA, KOPPAL TALUKA
 DIST. KOPPAL.

V"  11 . SMT. INDRAVVA,(SUMA)



W/ O MALLANAGOUDA KA'I"I'I,

AGE 26 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
R/O NELAGUDDA, KUNDGOL TALUKA
DIST. DHARWAD.

12. KASTURI,
D / O MAHADEVAPPA HANCHINAL
AGE 22 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
R/ O BETADUR, KUNDGOL TALUKA
DIST. DHARWAD. 

  I H I   , f. .P'ETr'1*1'o:s_IE;asI
(By Sri.CHANDRAMOI-IANKA-LE,ADV'___) -_ . "  

AND:

1. SMT.GADIGEVVA,   
w/0 FAKKIRAPPA MUDEPPANAVAR ' ._
AGE 50 YEARS, occ: 'AG'RIcUL'i_'URE._"v.I ' _
R/O BETADUR, KUNDGOL'-TALUILA    '
DIST. DHARWAD.    , 

2. SHIDDAPPA}     -  
S /0 MA_HAI3Ev:A_1?19A'HA1§IC.1i11\IAL.,' V
AGE 53 E*EA;-13; OCC: AGE-'ICUL'TU'RE"
R /0 BETAVI)U}'{I3Y SRI F.V.PATIL, ADV FOR R1.)

:I€'k'a\")(*

 '1'H°EsE" WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES

 226 ANDf_227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
"  V "CALL FOR THE RECORDS ON THE FILE OF 2"" ADDL. CIVIL
»JUDQE(SR.DN} AT HUBLI IN R.A.NO.171/O5 AND ETC.

THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE COMING ON FOR ORDERS

I  "THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:



additional evidence and only if the case is made for
acceptance of additional evidence at the 
stage. However, not a single reason is  
Court below to allow additional'evidence;it
should satisfy the Court that 
diligence, he could not   and
that those d0Cumen.t_s  proper
adjudication of the  this case, the
appellate   reason, has
allowed  that it is not only a
non--speakinigH  application of

mind.

4.  the "other.__..hand Sri. F.V.Patil learned

coiinseffor 'respondent No.1 submitted that what, is

:’u'<._.aVlVlowed' 'perinitting respondent No.1 to examine

_fst1fansI_ator' Lnviiigrespect of the documents which are

V .V 5 produced. .%-$51!;