High Court Kerala High Court

Veeravumma vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 12 February, 2008

Kerala High Court
Veeravumma vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 12 February, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 34028 of 2007(A)


1. VEERAVUMMA, W/O.LATE HAMSA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATTAMBI

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

5. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PATTAMBI

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :12/02/2008

 O R D E R
                             R. BASANT, J.

             ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

                   W.P.(C) No. 34028 OF 2007 A

             ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

            Dated this the 12th day of February, 2008


                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is the wife of a deceased person in

respect of whose death crime No.501/04 was initially

registered. Dissatisfied with the conduct of the investigation

in that crime registered under section 174 Cr.P.C., the

petitioner had come to this Court and this Court, by Ext.P4

order, had directed the Superintendent of Police, CBCID,

Palakkad to ensure that a proper investigation is conducted

by the CBCID. Accordingly, the investigation was continued

by the detecting inspector of CBCID, Palakkad. That

investigation is still in progress. Final report has not been

filed. The petitioner has now come to this Court dissatisfied

with the progress of the investigation. According to the

petitioner, proper investigation has not been conducted by the

investigating officer. Report of the investigating officer was

called for. Report has been filed. Copy has been furnished to

the petitioner. The investigating officer, in the report, submits

WPC.34028/07

: 2 :

that a proper investigation has been conducted and the

investigation is coming to the conclusion.

2. I am not satisfied that any directions need or

deserve to be issued at this stage. The investigating officer

must be given an opportunity to complete the investigation

and file a proper final report. At the moment, no further

directions deserve to be issued.

3. If the petitioner is aggrieved by such final report

filed, needless to say, remedies available to her under law

can be claimed by her.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner then prays

that there shall be a specific direction to expeditiously file the

final report. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the

investigation is almost complete and final report shall be filed

within a period of one month from this date.

5. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed

accepting that submission.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

aks