High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Verma Prasad Kushwaha vs The State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Verma Prasad Kushwaha vs The State Of Bihar on 23 February, 2011
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       Cr Misc No 4584 of 2011

           Verma Prasad Kushwaha, son of Jagarnath Pd Kishwaha, resident of
           Shanti Nagar, Ward No 1, Narkatiaganj, P S - Shikarpur, District -
           West Champaran                                       -       Petitioner

                                     Versus

          The State of Bihar                                           -           Opposite Party

                                    -----------

2 23.02.2011 The petitioner is the husband of the victim deceased lady

and is in custody since 18.03.2010 in relation to Shikarpur Police Station

Case No 30 of 2010 instituted under Sections 304B, 201/34 of Indian

Penal Code. The first information report is by the brother of the victim

lady, inter alia, alleging that the petitioner alongwith his family members

were demanding dowry soon after the marriage and used to beat up the

lady and ultimately burnt her to death and disposed of her body. Shri

Yugesh Chandra Verma, learned Senior Counsel appearing in support of

the petition draws attention of this Court to the depositions of the

informant, the victim lady’s father and other depositions of the

prosecution witnesses, all of whom have been declared hostile. The

informant, who is the brother of the deceased, states that the lady in fact

died of illness and that there was no question of the petitioner or anyone

killing her and disposing of her dead body.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner

abovenamed be released on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/-

(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of Fast Track Court No IV, West Champaran at Bettiah in
2
Sessions Trial No 354 of 2010 arising out of Shikarpur Police Station

Case No 30 of 2010.

Before parting, I would like to notice that the trial Court

may consider the desirability of instituting prosecution against the

prosecution witnesses for perjury and malicious prosecution for

mobilising police with a false plea. Steps should be taken expeditiously.

M.E.H./                                          (Navaniti Prasad Singh)