High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Vicky Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 17 March, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Vicky Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 17 March, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Cr.Misc. No.6213 of 2011
                      VICKY KUMAR, SON OF LATE KRISHNA PRASAD
                                           Versus
                                THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                         -----------

2. 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody

since 14.12.2010 for recovery of certain articles but they were not

subject matter of theft as also that now the petitioner’s mother

undertakes responsibility for his conduct after he is released from

the jail custody.

In view of the nature of allegation as also that he has

fair antecedents, let the petitioner above named, be released on

bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with

two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be

fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Railway

Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in Patna Sahib G.R.P. P.S. Case No.

501 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the

bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an

affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the

petitioner and the other shall be the mother of the petitioner. The

bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any

change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall

clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other
2

case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the

bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court

concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of

similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter

the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for

cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the

petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police

papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge

and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in

any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of

misuse. (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each

date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will

be liable to be cancelled.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner has been implicated repeatedly at the instance of the

local police who is hostile to the petitioner and seeks protection of

a person well reputed doing social service in the area. Under the

circumstances, the petitioner will report to Mr. Kishore Kunal,

Chairman, Bihar Religious Trust Board, Bihar, Patna, within

fifteen days of his release and file a certificate about the same in

the court, upon which the court below will grant provisional bail

for a period of six months. In case, the petitioner fails to file

certificate, a notice shall be sent to him for cancellation of bail,

(ii) that once the petitioner reports to Mr. Kunal, Mr. Kunal is

requested to evolve a method by which without affecting the
3

petitioner’s present vocation, if any, the petitioner can be made

socially productive so that an effort is made to bring him back in

the main stream of the society, he is given adequate protection

and (iii) at the end of the six months, the petitioner will be

required to file a certificate in the court below granted by Mr.

Kishore Kunal. If the certificate granted to the petitioner is found

satisfactory, the court below will confirm the provisional bail

granted to the petitioner or else will issue notice for cancellation

of bail.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali