High Court Kerala High Court

Vidhyadharan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 19 September, 2007

Kerala High Court
Vidhyadharan vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 19 September, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5666 of 2007()


1. VIDHYADHARAN,S/O. JANARDHANAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :19/09/2007

 O R D E R
                               R.BASANT, J
                       ------------------------------------
                         B.A.No.5666 of 2007
                       -------------------------------------
             Dated this the 19th day of September, 2007

                                   ORDER

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner faces allegations

under Section 498 A I.P.C. He was allegedly guilty of matrimonial

cruelty of the culpable variety against his wife. The marriage took

place in 2006. Spouses are not blessed with any children. Crime has

been registered on the basis of a private complaint filed by the

complainant before the learned Magistrate which has been referred to

the police by the learned Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.

Investigation is in progress. The petitioner apprehends imminent

arrest.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays, the learned

Public Prosecutor does not oppose the said prayer and I am satisfied

in the facts and circumstances of this case that anticipatory bail can be

granted to the petitioner, subject to appropriate conditions.

3. I reckon the stand taken by the learned Public Prosecutor

as reasonable as arrest and incarceration of the petitioner is likely to

mar all possibility of reconciliation in the matrimony. Appropriate

conditions can, of course, be imposed in the interests of a fair, efficient

and expeditious investigation.

B.A.No.5666 of 2007 2

4. In the result, the Bail Application is, allowed. The following

directions are issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

i) The petitioner shall appear before the learned Magistrate at

11 a.m on 26.09.2007. He shall be enlarged on regular bail on his

executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only)

with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of

the learned Magistrate;

ii) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation

before the Investigating Officer between 10 a.m and 1 p.m on

27.09.2007 and 28.09.2007 and thereafter between 10 a.m and 12

noon on all Mondays and Fridays for a period of two months.

Subsequently the petitioner shall make himself available for

interrogation before the Investigating Officer as and when directed by

the Investigating Officer in writing to do so;

iii) If the petitioner does not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to arrest the

petitioner and deal with him in accordance with law as if those

directions were not issued at all;

iv) If the petitioner were arrested prior to his surrender on

26.09.07 as directed in clause (1) above, he shall be released from

B.A.No.5666 of 2007 3

custody on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five

thousand only) without any sureties undertaking to appear before the

learned Magistrate on 26.09.07.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
rtr/-