Vijay Kumar Chaudhary vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 11 February, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Vijay Kumar Chaudhary vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 11 February, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CWJC No.3097 of 2006

VIJAY KUMAR CHAUDHARY SON OF SRI HARI CHAUDHARY, RESIDENT
OF MOHALLA- BHUSUANDA BALAPAR, WARD NO.40, POLICE STATION-
GAYA MUFFASIL, DISTRICT-GAYA AT PRESENT WORKING AS
SECRETARY NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMITTEE BHUSUNDA BALAPAR
UNDER WARD NO.40 GAYA TOWN.
                                   Versus
          1. THE STATE OF BIHAR.
          2. THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN
             DEVELOPMENT CUM-CHAIRMAN EXECUTIVE
             COMMITTEE, BIHAR URBAN DEVELOPMENT
             AUTHORITY PATNA.
          3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE GAYA CUM-CHAIRMAN
             DISTRICT URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GAYA.
          4. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER GAYA MUNICIPAL
             CORPORATION GAYA.
          5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER BOARD GAYA
             MUNICIPAL CORPORATION GAYA.
                                             ..RESPONDENTS.
                                 -----------

5. 11.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

counsel for the Gaya Municipal Corporation.

2. Petitioner is the Secretary of the

Neighbourhood Committee constituted in the light of the

Government instruction dated 11.9.2003, Annexure-3 for

Ward No.40 of Gaya Municipal Corporation. It is

submitted on his behalf that in spite of the Government

direction to allocate work concerning the difference

Schemes formulated for betterment of the weaker sections

as noted in Government instruction dated 24.3.2004,
2

Annexure-4 and subsequent instruction dated 28.7.2005,

Annexure-6 the work for the execution of the Schemes

referred to in those instructions are not being entrusted to

the committee and thereby the execution of the Schemes

referred to in those instructions of the Government is

suffering in Ward No.40 of Gaya Town. In spite of notice

to the authorities, no counter affidavit has been filed

disputing the submissions noted above, accordingly, this

writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to

represent before the Municipal Commissioner, Gaya

Municipal Corporation to allocate work concerning the

execution of the Scheme as noted in the Government

instruction dated 24.3.2004 and 28.7.2005, Annexures 4

and 6 provided those instructions are still in force.

Necessary consideration in this regard be made by the

Commissioner, Gaya Municipal Corporation, as early as

possible, in any case within two months from the date of

receipt/production of the fresh representation alongwith a

copy of this order.

3. Application stands disposed of.

Ibrar/                                    ( V. N. Sinha, J.)
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *