High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Vijay Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 23 June, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Vijay Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 23 June, 2010
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Cr. Misc. No.11770 of 2010
                         VIJAY KUMAR son of Bhola Kumar
                                       Versus
                              THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                      -----------

4/ 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under section 304-B, 201 Indian Penal Code in which

subsequently chargesheet under section 302, 201/34 of the Indian

Penal Code was submitted.

In the First Information Report, allegation against the

petitioner and other in-laws is that daughter of the informant was

murdered by them for ends of dowry. However, during investigation

number of witnesses stated that the deceased herself committed

suicide. It also transpired that the marriage had taken place more than

eight years ago and, therefore, chargesheet was submitted under

section 302, 201 Indian Penal Code.

Submission is that since the chargesheet has now been

submitted under section 304-B Indian Penal Code question of

presumption would not arise against in-laws and general allegation

without any corroboration has no meaning.

In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand)

with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nuagachia, Bhagalpur, in

connection with Naugachia (Parbatta) P.S. Case No. 188 of 2006,

subject to the conditions (i)That one of the bailors will be a close
-2-

relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy

as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake

to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of

the petitioner, (ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he

will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date

fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays

the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for

reasons of misuse, (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on

each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will

be liable to be cancelled.

JA/-                                    (Anjana Prakash, J.)