High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Vijay Singh vs Secretary on 17 December, 2008

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Vijay Singh vs Secretary on 17 December, 2008
IN THE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH

                                      CIVIL WRIT PETITION 18354 OF 2007

                                      DECIDED ON :17-12-2008

Vijay Singh

                                                                ....Petitioner

                       versus

Secretary, Public Health Department, Govt.of Hy.and another

                                                                ....Respondents
CORAM :        HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHTAB S GILL

               HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K KANNAN

Present:       Shri J.S.Mehndiratta, Advocate, for the petitioner

               Shri Harish Rathee, Senior DAG, Haryana

K KANNAN, J

1.The petitioner seeks for Madamus to be issued for promotion from the

post of skilled coolie to Well Borar in the Public Health Department. The contest by the

State is two fold. There are proposals for re-structuring the cadre by introducing an

additional post of Strata Observer between post of skilled coolie and “well borer” and

that it is not possible to take up for consideration the petitioner’s demand for the present

. The second objection is that there is no vacancy on the promotion post right now and

there are five persons senior to the petitioner for the post.

2.The rival contentions would require to be seen in the factual matrix of

the petitioner who has joined the services as a skilled coolie on daily wages on 08-10-

1987 and he was regularised on the post on 01-04-1993. The specific Govt.Rules

notified in the Haryana Govt.Gazette on 24-11-1998 makes skilled coolie or a T Mate

as a feeder cadre consideration and the experience for appointment by promotion is 12

years in the post for promotion to the post of Well Borer. Admittedly, the petitioner has

completed 12 years of service and his request for being considered for promotion was

routed through SDE on 04-10-2004 in anticipation of his completion of 12 years on 01-4-

2005. The petitioner also secured direction from this Court that his request for

promotion should be considered in CWP 6742 of 2007. Consequently, a speaking order

had been passed on 10-07-2004 which is impugned in the writ petition setting out the

fact that out of 5 persons who are seniors to the petitioner 4 persons had been working

as strata observers and one remained as a skilled coolie. The petitioner, however,

points out from the statement made on behalf of the State that out of 6 posts which are
CWP 18354 of 2007 –2–

available for well borers, one Veer Bhan had expired on 07-08-2007 and 3 posts of well

borers were still lying vacant . Although, Shri Amar Singh and Surinder Kumar, skilled

coolies, had declined the promotion , it was not to the post of Well Borers but only

declined to get promotion to the post of the Strata Observer. The petitioner contended

that the posts are still not being filled up and if the post of Strata Observer has not been

approved by any amendment to the Recruitment Rules, the State shall not wait

indefinitely for amending the rules and stall promotion which was due to the employees.

3.While we may concede in favour of the State that it has the prerogative

to make its own plans for re-structuring of its cadre, we cannot approve of an indefinite

wait that could stall promotion prospects of its employees. The admitted vacancies

have to be filled up and the State Govt.is bound to set itself a time frame before when

the promotions could be effected. The State cannot offer to the seniors of the petitioner

the posts of Strata Observers created de facto but that do not obtain sanction through

its rules. If it finds that the petitioner’s seniors would not accept the posts not sanctioned

by the rules, it cannot use its own default to deny its employees the legitimate

expectation of promotion. It will ill-behove of the State to demoralise its staff by

adopting unrealistic policies or keep its employees guessing on how their promotions

would be worked out. The employees have legitimate expectations of their own career

prospects and the promotional avenue cannot be kept in abeyance .

4.Under the circumstances, while we cannot issue the Mandamus in the

manner sought for by the petitioner , we direct that the respondents take the existing

post of well borer as sanctioned by the Rules alone as available and offer promotion for

the employees in the next lower grade in the order of seniority within a period of three

months from the date when the copy of this order is made ready. If the promotional post

is not accepted by any of the seniors of the petitioner and if any of the posts is still

available, the petitioner shall be considered in such promotion post.

5.We dispose of this writ petition in the above terms.

       Sd/-                                                             sd/-

{Mehtab S Gill}                                                      {K Kannan}
  Judge                                                                   Judge

17 -12-2008

Internet:              Yes

Reportable:            Yes