High Court Karnataka High Court

Vijaya N Aradhya vs Nanda Kumari on 3 September, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Vijaya N Aradhya vs Nanda Kumari on 3 September, 2009
Author: Lok Adalath
Ase: 

HEGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT
:N THE HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 03'" DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2o99{ , OC,,,
CONCMATORS PRESENT:     O O

flON'BLE MR..'}USTIC.E A.S.PACHHA.'Pfi?£E'v    '-

SRLPRASAD SUBBANNA}':«,M£";_Mi3ESRy O,"  

Miscellaneous First  
Lok Adalat No.112»6/"2999'*._  
BETWEEN;      

VIJAYA N.ARADHYA,

D/O.M.P.NAGABUSHAN, -. 

AOEO ABOUT45 YEARS,  

-ADVOCATE,   ,    =

C.I.L. COLONY, SAN3£xYN,I§cGAR,3'_,_      

BANGALORE-94. 2  ' ' .. APPELLANT

aw sMT.I.s,.K.NAeARATHNA, ADVOCATE)

AND:   .     -- -

1. NANOA KUMAT11," V .  
W/0.SAT_IS_H CHARRARAKEE. 
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, .

" 'R,/A NO_.':3, uN.1RAMAPP~A----GARDEN,
 GE'DDALAH}\Li.I,'*RMV II STAGE,
SAHGALORE '- 94." 

SATiSH--.CHARRARA.4<EE,
 s=A"rHER's-..N,AMgj'..NOT KNOWN,
 R,/A N.O;_=3,,_ mu-N'1RAMARPA_-_OAROEN-,
~ .. .13»  _c;;--:OOA'LA<RA'i;u, RMV II ST-'A-GE,
 SA-N:GA1.OR1E - 94.

,  NA??iOr4A_1,-:NSuRAN-CE COMPANY LTD.,
 .___BY I'?§'S- REG-§0=NA-L MANAOS-R, N-0.2-8,
A _ 'z;sNm' BU-ILDING AN-Nexs,

1' '  _ ";MISSIO'N ROAD, BANGALORE -2?.  RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.M.NARAYANAPPA, ADV.F-‘OR R2)

MFA FILED U/5.173(1) O? MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMEWF AND AWARE) DA”E”‘£”:I3
9-8-2005, PASSED IN MVC NO.16-47/2003 ON THE FILE 0?’ ‘THE XV} AEDDL. SMALL CAUSES
JUDGE, MEMBER, MACT, METROPOLITAN AREA, BANGALORE (SCCH-14}, PARTLY

ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF
COMPENSATION.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT AFTER BEING
REFERRED VIDE ORDER DATED 12-8-2009, THE FOLLOWING ORDER IS PASSEiZ}..-‘-_’

CONCILIATION ORDER

The learned counsel for the appellant

counsel for respondent — Insurance Comp4anyI’ai’on”g

representative are present.

2. After protracted negotiations, ‘the rrr-atter_isJsetvt.!.ed§

appellant has agreed to receiveLVI’Va’ndVV the :r_e’spofndent –
Insurance Company has agreed ofTRsx.65,G0G/-
(Rupees Sixty Five Thousand’ ‘ani~,r,, at 6% pa.
from the date of clvai:m..__pel{§iti’on:::::til:l of deposit, in
addition to what tharléibunal, in full and
final settlement oi thé.LL’r;lVai.rrr; is filed on behalf of

the parties to this ‘erffa;;t.”i_” I

3. The respondent Company shall deposit the
said amount .before”Tribunal, within 6 weeks from the date

Of Pii’eiparaflif3in Award; i I i

4. first appeal stands disposed of in

of’the”Join.tv*V’ri\§e1mo. The award of the Tribunal shall stand

modified accoyrdinglfiy. Draw up the Award accordingly.

Sc:I/-

FUDGE

gy.

imam

I”?