High Court Kerala High Court

Vijayakumar vs The Circle Inspector Of Police on 29 October, 2010

Kerala High Court
Vijayakumar vs The Circle Inspector Of Police on 29 October, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 28671 of 2010(H)


1. VIJAYAKUMAR, AGED 33 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

3. JAYAKUMAR,

4. SURESH KUMAR,

5. SUNIL KUMAR,

6. ANILKUMAR,

7. STATE OF KERALA,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.D.KISHORE

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MRS. Justice M.C.HARI RANI

 Dated :29/10/2010

 O R D E R
            K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ.
                    * * * * * * * * * * * * *
                     W.P.C.No.28671 of 2010
                   ----------------------------------------
            Dated this the 29th day of October 2010

                        J U D G M E N T

K.M.JOSEPH,J

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the

following reliefs:

a. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other

appropriate writ, direction or order directing the

respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate and

effective police protection to the life of the

petitioner.

2. Briefly put, the case of the petitioner is as follows:

3. The petitioner and respondents 3 to 6 are neighbours.

The daughter of the 4th respondent was found missing along with

one Santhosh. Respondents 3 to 6 blamed the petitioner as the

man behind who helped and aided the said Santhosh. Thereafter

there is reference to Ext.P1 complaint filed by the petitioner on

the basis of the threat and trespass alleged to have taken place

on 09/07/2010. The petitioner filed Ext.P2 petition to the Chief

Minister. Followed by Ext.P2 petition, Ext.P3 petition was filed

before the Minister of Internal Affairs. Followed by Ext.P3

W.P.C.No.28671 of 2010 2

petition, Ext.P4 petition was filed before the Superintendent of

Police. Ext.P5 is the copy of the FIR lodged. It is alleged that

respondents are threatening and harassing the petitioner and his

aged mother. Life of the petitioner is stated to be in danger.

4. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

and the learned Government Pleader. The learned Government

Pleader would submit that the respondents think that the

petitioner aided and abetted Santhosh as alleged in the petition.

In view of the apprehension raised by the petitioner, the writ

petition is disposed of as follows:

5. If the petitioner brings to the notice of the second

respondent any threat from respondents 3 to 6 to the life of the

petitioner, the second respondent will promptly look into it and

if it is found to be genuine, the second respondent shall afford

protection to the life of the petitioner as against respondents 3 to

6.




                                           (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)



                                       (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE)
jsr    // True Copy//      PA to Judge

W.P.C.No.28671 of 2010    3

W.P.C.No.28671 of 2010    4

W.P.C.No.28671 of 2010    5




                          K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ.




                                             .No. of 200




                                    ORDER/JUDGMENT




                                             30/082010