Karnataka High Court
Vijayananda Roadlines Ltd vs Mr M H Swaminathan on 2 February, 2010
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 2"" DAY OF FEBRUARY
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE. S.A'B'H'A'_§g:i'T
AND
THE HoN'sLE MR. JuST:cE'R..S.N."S.A:TYARz.ARA¥ANA %
c.c.c. NO.521/_ii)(f$)={CivT.f)*«A_:v._
BETWEEN
VIJAYANAN-DA :Ro:A[:Lm"ES._LTte.,
REP. 3*-}( R.AN.GANATH G.A'DAGK'AR,
S/O iB'613--H"ARAG'-.GA"DAGKAR,'
AGEO1A..A'£.:r:;,LJT .r;5..YE'A.RS.
O£:"£:":"L.EfOAL7'§.ADv:soR SLORA HOLDER OF
V_IJAYANfa'.N.DA> RQAD'LINES LTD.,
R'/O SIRUR .}}'.ARK;'»VIDYANAGAR, HUBLI.
COMPLAINANT
(B;»,I.."<Sr:_'i-E..: SHERARRKUMAR ASSTS., ADVs.,
.SRI_P._vPRAS'ANNA KUMAR, ADv., )
mumumumunnioou
~ Mr' M H SWAMINATHAN
"j_«THE SECRETARY To GOVERNMENT,
" DEPARTMENT OF FOREST,
STATE OF KARRATAKA,
M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE 560001
3
2 MR. AMBADY MADHAV,
DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST 8:
AUTHORISED OFFICER,
HASSAN DIVISION,
HASSAN.
ACCUSED
(By Sri V.S. HEGDE, AGA., FOR A1 & A2 "
CCC IS FILED U/S 11 & ,1-ZOE THE_,C'0-.NTEM'PTv..4
OF COURT ACT PRAYING T0¥_IN13TIiiT£ 'C 0-NTE»MP.T.
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED. "F'o.R=._
DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED .,»2tt.01.2;J09
PASSED IN w.p.No.19.56/2007_(G~M4.F0~R)"IAT
ANNEXURE-'A'. _
THIS CONTEMPT PETITI'.0N"-».CoMIN'G ON FOR
FRAMING OF CHARGE 'I'_HI--S. 'D._A.Y;~._SABHAHIT 3.,
MADE THE :=oLL.owING,g-' .
Tsai;-.«. 'Co;:1'teCj;~n'Tpt_:D"-eetition is filed alleging
dis0bedie§'1'c<_éVto.¥:haé;dVii9éction issued by this Court in
. _ wk} a~;o.1vT9z55/'20'0"7' dated 27.01.2009.
_V -.4vL-earned counsel appearing for both the
L"'pa rt'seV§ that the order passed in W.P.
N0".'19E'$:6./'2.:()07 dated 27.01.2009 has been stayed
.. ., " tn app,é_aL
'V-7'
3
3. Under the circumstances, the question of
proceeding against the respondents at thisVV.st§§'ge
does not arise.
Accordingiy, the Contempiat P:e,ti.t”~ion
of. Respondents are discharged” to
work out their remedy in Iejvv after
the disposal of the .*::;:i_.f)f’e_ai*’_.V_ ” ‘
it ‘ § W%€,tSd/h
‘x x IUIXSE
Sd/e
JUDGE
surrfa