High Court Kerala High Court

Vijil vs State Of Kerala on 10 June, 2010

Kerala High Court
Vijil vs State Of Kerala on 10 June, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 3376 of 2010()


1. VIJIL, S/O.JOSEPH
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :10/06/2010

 O R D E R
                                K.HEMA, J
                            -----------------------
                        B.A No. 3376 OF 2010
                       --------------------------------
                Dated this the 10th day of June 2010

                                  ORDER

This petition is for anticipatory bail.

2. The alleged offences are under Section 17 of the Kerala

Money Lenders Act and Section 420 IPC. According to prosecution,

petitioner was running money lending business without obtaining

license and that he has cheated several persons and committed

the above offences.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner

is totally innocent of the allegations made. Petitioner is doing real

estate business and used to have money transaction in

connection with the same. While giving advance, he used to take

cheque as security. No person has given any complaint before

police alleging that he or she was cheated by petitioner in any

manner. Crime is registered suo-motu by Circle Inspector of

police. Prosecution has no case that petitioner is running any

business is running in any office or building.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that crime is

registered suo-motu by Circle Inspector of police. As per the

statements in Case Diary, cheques were issued by certain persons

involved in real estate business. Hence, this petition is not

opposed.

B.A No. 3376 OF 2010 2

5. On hearing both sides, considering the peculiar facts and

circumstances of the case, I am satisfied that anticipatory bail

can be granted on conditions. Hence, the following order is

passed.

(1) Petitioner shall surrender before the

Magistrate Court concerned within seven

days from today.

(2) On such surrender, petitioner shall be

released on bail on his executing a bond for

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only)

each with two solvent sureties each for the

like sum to the satisfaction of the learned

Magistrate on the following conditions:

(i) Petitioner shall report before the
Investigating Officer as and when
directed and co-operate with
investigation.

(ii) Petitioner shall not influence or
intimidate any witnesses or tamper
with any evidence.

Petition is allowed.

K.HEMA
JUDGE

vdv