High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Vikas Chaudhary vs The State Of Bihar on 20 October, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Vikas Chaudhary vs The State Of Bihar on 20 October, 2011
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            Criminal Miscellaneous No.32611 of 2011
                  Vikas Chaudhary, son of Parmeshwar Chaudhary, resident of
                      village-Maidapur, P.S. Bochahan, Distt. Muzaffarpur.
                                                Versus
                                       The State Of Bihar
                                    ----------------------------------

2. 20.10.2011 Petitioner is one of the named accused in this

registered under Section 366(A), 496, 379, 323, of the

Indian Penal Code and 3(X)(1)SC/ST Act.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioners submits that petitioner has been falsely

implicated in this case only to put undue pressure as the

petitioner refused to perform the marriage with complaint-

informant Nirmala Kumari. Learned counsel for the

petitioner further submitted that while the occurrence is said

to be in between 11.9.2010 to 13.09.2010 but complaint

petition has been filed on 14.9.2010 in the court of C.J.M.,

Muzaffarpur, before that no information regarding missing of

the complainant/victim has been given to the police station

or anywhere by the family of victim. It is further submitted

that victim/informant Nirmala kumari in her statement

recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has denied about

sexual relationship with the petitioner which will appear

from Annexure-2. It is also submitted that in the complaint

petition, the occurrence is stated to be on 11.9.2010 to

13.9.2010 but the informant/complaint in her statement has

stated that the date of occurrence is 20.3.2010 which is

itself sufficient to show false implication of the petitioner.
2

The allegation of informant/victim Nirmala

Kumari against the petitioner is that in course of returning

from coaching centre, she was captured by the petitioner

and taken away in the house of brother-in-law where the

petitioner performed the marriage with her.

Under the facts and circumstances of the case

as stated above, the petitioner named above is ordered to

be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10, 000/-

(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to

the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in

connection with Bochachan P.S. Case No. 205 of 2010.

Ravi/-                            (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)